Research Article
An Efficient Algorithm for Decomposition of Partially Ordered Sets
Table 2
A comparison between ILPM and the proposed algorithm on 2n-cycle.
| Nā=ā2n | Comparable pairs, N | Standard (P) | ILPM | Proposed algorithm | (P) | CPU time | (P) | CPU time |
| 50 | 50 | 25 | 25 | 0.089045 | 25 | 0.002301 | 100 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 0.106691 | 50 | 0.0043507 | 150 | 150 | 75 | 75 | 0.165378 | 75 | 0.0081102 | 200 | 200 | 100 | 100 | 0.239956 | 100 | 0.0108141 | 250 | 250 | 125 | 125 | 0.431634 | 125 | 0.016587 | 300 | 300 | 150 | 150 | 0.474245 | 150 | 0.0246753 | 350 | 350 | 175 | 175 | 0.622573 | 175 | 0.0349737 | 400 | 400 | 200 | 200 | 0.756483 | 200 | 0.0705701 | 450 | 450 | 225 | 225 | 0.948467 | 225 | 0.0999672 | 500 | 500 | 250 | 250 | 1.216359 | 250 | 0.1508073 |
|
|