Performance Analysis of Two Different Types of Waiting Queues with Working Vacations

<div><i>θ</i>’s effects on <span class="nowrap"><svg height="11.927pt" id="M188" style="vertical-align:-3.291101pt" version="1.1" viewbox="-0.0498162 -8.6359 14.9762 11.927" width="14.9762pt" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink"><g transform="matrix(.013,0,0,-0.013,0,0)"><path d="M743 375C743 570 607 650 407 650H136L130 622C214 612 220 606 204 526L125 122C110 43 105 36 24 27L17 0H250C382 0 482 23 571 76C680 141 743 248 743 375ZM644 379C644 188 520 36 305 36C277 36 249 38 229 46C205 55 202 71 212 126L293 553C300 588 306 600 317 606C330 613 356 617 390 617C547 617 644 537 644 379Z"></path></g><g transform="matrix(.0091,0,0,-0.0091,9.893,3.132)"><path d="M245 635C92 635 37 457 37 312C37 149 91 -12 244 -12C395 -12 449 166 449 312C449 469 395 635 245 635ZM243 598C332 598 358 454 358 312C358 173 334 26 245 26C158 26 128 174 128 313S152 598 243 598Z"></path></g></svg>.</span></div>

Journal of Mathematics

fig7

Figure 7

Figure 7: Performance Analysis of Two Different Types of Waiting Queues with Working Vacations 