Journal of Nutrition and Metabolism / 2014 / Article / Tab 4 / Research Article
Body Composition and Basal Metabolic Rate in Women with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Table 4 Difference between the means of anthropometric, biochemical, and body composition of women with diabetes mellitus type 2 classified according to nutritional status [
18 ].
Normal weight Pre-obese Obese ( ) ( ) ( ) Mean (95% CI) Mean ( 95% CI) Mean ( 95% CI) Age (years) 52.6 (43.2; 62.0) 52.2 (43.0; 61.4) 50.7 (47.6; 53.9) BM (kg) 57.0 (52.0; 62.0)ab 67.5 (62.2; 72.9)ac 87.4 (83.7; 91.2)bc LBM (kg) 36.8 (34.9; 38.8)b 39.5 (35.9; 43.1)c 48.8 (46.7; 50.9)bc FM (kg) 20.0 (14.2; 25.8)ab 27.8 (23.4; 32.2)ac 38.0 (35.6; 40.5)bc FPG (mg/dL) 129.0 (67.2; 190.8) 102.8 (95.7; 109.9) 155.9 (121.1; 190.7) A1C (%) 7.4 (5.6; 9.2) 6.2 (5.5; 7.0) 8.1 (6.7; 9.5) BMR (kcal) 1129.2 (905.0; 1352.4)b 1211.8 (1044.9; 1378.7)c 1545.7 (1418.7; 1672.7)bc BMR/BM (kcal·kg−1 ) 19.9 (15.2; 24.6) 18.0 (15.7; 20.2) 17.7 (16.4; 18.9) BMR/LBM (kcal·kg−1 ) 30.7 (24.3; 37.1) 30.6 (28.4; 32.8) 31.8 (29.1; 34.4) Estimated BMR (kcal) Harris and Benedict [10 ] 1239.9 (1165.5; 1314.2)b 1342.5 (1274.3; 1410.7)c 1544.3 (1502.3; 1586.4)bc Difference
(1)
110.7 (−90.2; 311.5) 130.7 (2.3; 259.1) −1.3 (−133.0; 110.4) Deviation %
(2)
11.7 (−7.7; 31.1) 11.7 (−1.4; 24.8) 2.7 (−6.7; 12.1) FAO/WHO/UNU [11 ] 1324.6 (1281.1; 1368.0)ab 1416.6 (1369.9; 1463.2)ac 1589.7 (1557.2; 1622.2)bc Difference
(1)
195.4 (−36.6; 427.3) 204.8 (55.9; 353.7) 44.1 (−69.9; 158.0) Deviation %
(2)
19.7 (−4.0; 43.5) 18.0 (2.0; 34.1) 6.0 (−4.3; 16.3) Owen et al. [19 ] 1203.9 (1168.1; 1239.9)ab 1279.9 (1241.5; 1318.4)ac 1422.8 (1396.0; 1449.6)bc Difference
(1)
74.8 (−155.3; 304.8) 68.1 (−83.0; 219.3) −122.9 (−238.5; −7.2) Deviation %
(2)
8.8 (−12.7; 30.3) 6.7 (−8.0; 21.3) −5.1 (−14.4; 4.2) Mifflin et al. [20 ] 1111.9 (1010.3; 1213.6)b 1218.4 (1120.7; 1316.1)c 1440.3 (1386.4; 1494.3)bc Difference
(1)
−17.2 (−228.9; 194.5) 6.6 (−115.6; 128.9) −105.3 (−216.2; 5.5) Deviation %
(2)
0.1 (−17.6; 17.8) 1.2 (−9.3; 11.7) −4.4 (−12.8; 4.0) Gougeon et al. [23 ] 1126.5 (1078.5; 1174.5)b 1235.2 (1149.3; 1321.2)c 1551.4 (1495.9; 1606.8)bc Difference
(1)
−2.7 (−240.2; 234.9) 23.4 (−97.5; 144.4) 5.7 (−106.5; 117.9) Deviation %
(2)
1.9 (−19.1; 22.9) 2.6 (−8.0; 13.1) 3.1 (−6.3; 12.5) Huang et al. [6 ] 1303.1 (1224.2; 1381.9)b 1408.8 (1333.1; 1484.6)c 1621.5 (1575.1; 1667.8)bc Difference
(1)
173.9 (−50.5; 398.2) 197.1 (67.8; 326.3) 75.8 (−34.9; 186.5) Deviation %
(2)
17.6 (−4.6; 39.8) 17.2 (3.5; 30.9) 7.8 (−2.01; 17.7) Rodrigues et al. [18 ] 1178.8 (1116.3; 1241.3)b 1280.4 (1219.4; 1341.4)c 1485.4 (1441.3; 1529.4)bc Difference
(1)
49.6 (−173.4; 272.6) 68.6 (−66.7; 203.9) −60.3 (−171.0; 50.5) Deviation %
(2)
6.4 (−13.7; 26.6) 6.6 (−6.3; 19.4) −1.2 (−10.2; 7.8)
BM: body mass; LBM: lean body mass; FM: fat mass; FPG: fasting plasma glucose; A1C: glycated hemoglobin; BMR: basal metabolic rate; BMR/BM: basal metabolic rate adjusted for BM; BMR/LBM: basal metabolic rate adjusted for LBM; 95% CI: 95% confidence interval. One-way ANOVA-Tukey: a b c same letters express significant difference between groups.
(1)
(Estimated − measured) (kcal in 24 h).
(2)
(Difference/measured) × 100 (%).