Research Article

Association between Copeptin and Metabolic Syndrome: A Systematic Review

Table 2

Relationship between copeptin and metabolic syndrome.

Study idCopeptin categories valuesMetS and copeptin (high vs. low)Mets and copeptin (Q2 vs. Q1)Mets and copeptin (Q3 vs. Q1)Mets and copeptin (Q4 vs. Q1)Adjusted variables
Odds ratio 95% confidence interval

Saleem-2009 (AA)Q1 (<5.0)NE1.42 (1.05–1.93)1.49 (1.07–2.06)2.07 (1.45–2.95)Age, sex, creatinine, smoking,statin or diuretic use, history of myocardial infarction/stroke, physical activity, and educational status
Q2 (5.0–8.0)
Q3 (8.0–12.7)
Q4 (>12.7)
Saleem-2009 (NHW)Q1 (<3.3)NE1.12 (0.79–1.59)1.79 (1.27–2.51)1.74 (1.21–2.50)
Q2 (3.3–5.0)
Q3 (5.0–7.9)
Q4 (>7.9)

Enhörning-2011Men:NE1.55 (1.25–1.93)1.82 (1.47–2.25)1.93 (1.57–2.39)None
Q1 (<4.6)
Q2 (4.6–7.1)
Q3 (7.1–10.6)
Q4 (10.7–4.3)
Women:
Q1 (<2.7)
Q2 (2.7–4.2)
Q3 (4.3–6.4)
Q4 (6.5–14.3)

Enhörning-2013NRNE1.21 (0.85–1.72)1.05 (0.74–1.49)1.34 (0.95–1.91)Follow-up time, age, sex, cystatin C, hypertension, glucose, triglycerides, HDL, and waist circumference

Then-2015 (men)NRNENENE1.13 (0.72–1.76)Age, history of myocardial infarction/stroke, smoking, alcohol intake, and physical activity
Then-2015 (women)NRNENENE1.11 (0.68–1.83)

Vintilă-2016Low (0.1–196.4)20 (3.03–131.7)NENENENone
High (196.5–455.1)

Canivell-2017NR1.12 (0.74–1.69)NENENEAge, sex, center, socioeconomic status, intake of fruits and vegetables, physical activity, alcohol intake, smoking, testosterone, and estradiol daytime urinary excretion

Deligözoğlu-2020Q1 (<17.0)NENE0.86 (0.22–3.28)0.33 (0.06–1.43)None
Q2 (17.0–26.4)
Q3 (26.6–40.0)
Q4 (40.3–95.0)

AA: African-Americans, NHW: non-Hispanic Whites, MetS: metabolic syndrome, SD: standard deviation, NR: not reported, and NE: not evaluated. Significative values are in bold.