The Effect of Soy and Whey Protein Supplementation on Glucose Homeostasis in Healthy Normal Weight Asian Indians
Table 2
Comparison of calorimetry measures and VAS scores between 4 intervention meals.
Calorimetry measures
15% soy
30% soy
15% whey
30% whey
value
VO2(L/min)
iAUC
0.11 ± 0.02
0.12 ± 0.04
0.10 ± 0.04
0.14 ± 0.03
0.04
Peak responseb
0.26 ± 0.01
0.27 ± 0.02
0.26 ± 0.02
0.27 ± 0.02
0.001
VCO2(L/min)
iAUC
0.16 ± 0.03
0.15 ± 0.04
0.13 ± 0.03
0.16 ± 0.03
0.18
Peak response
0.23 ± 0.02
0.24 ± 0.02
0.24 ± 0.02
0.24 ± 0.01
0.21
RQ
iAUC
0.20 ± 0.12
0.21 ± 0.11
0.18 ± 0.11
0.18 ± 0.11
0.90
Peak response
0.94 ± 0.04
0.94 ± 0.05
0.93 ± 0.05
0.91 ± 0.04
0.26
EE (kcal/min)
iAUC
2.60 ± 0.60
2.87 ± 0.77
2.50 ± 0.65
3.25 ± 0.51
0.06
Peak responsea,b
5.32 ± 0.36
5.51 ± 0.41
5.43 ± 0.46
5.57 ± 0.46
0.001
VAS scores
Hunger
4.42 ± 1.78
4.34 ± 1.83
4.66 ± 1.63
4.59 ± 1.40
0.89
Thought of food
4.23 ± 1.77
4.27 ± 1.74
4.55 ± 1.65
4.38 ± 1.41
0.76
Urge to eat
4.03 ± 1.28
4.29 ± 1.73
4.58 ± 1.56
4.39 ± 1.32
0.63
Fullness
3.87 ± 1.62
4.15 ± 1.68
3.90 ± 1.81
3.92 ± 1.62
0.95
Reported as mean ± SD; values using RMANOVA. RQ, respiratory quotient; EE, energy expenditure; VAS, visual analogue scale. iAUC, incremental area under the curve. (a) 30% soy is significantly different from 15% soy and (b) 30% whey is significantly different from 15% whey.
