Research Article

The Effectiveness of Zinc Supplementation in Taste Disorder Treatment: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Table 2

Summary of the findings of the included studies.

Author (s), yearTest methodStatistical analysisZinc level at baselineZinc status after treatment/intervention groupZinc status after treatment/placebo groupSignificant improvement against placeboTaste status/intervention groupTaste status/placebo groupSignificant improvement against placebo

Ikeda et al., 2013 [23]Filter paper disc methodWilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher’s exact test71.1 µg/dl zinc group, 73.5 µg/dl placebo groupNRNRNRNRNRNR
Sakagami et al., 2009 [24]Filter paper disc method and serum zinc levelShirley-Williams test and unpaired student’s t-test, Dunnett’s test, Fisher’s exact test↓ 69 µg/dlSerum zinc level ↑ 5.7 ± 13.5 (17 mg), 11.4 ± 16.6 (34 mg), and 20.6 ± 21.3 (68 mg), respectively, (), statistically significant increase in group receiving 68 mg of zinc ()1.8 ± 12.7() sigThe efficient rate of gustatory sensitivity was 51.9%, 80.0% and 89.3% in the 17 mg, 34 mg and 68 mg zinc-treated groups, respectivelyThe efficient rate (63.0%) sig
Stewart-Knox et al., 2008 [25]Detection thresholds for sweet, sour, salty, bitter and umamiFactorial ANOVAWithin normal range for placebo and zinc groups (11–18 µ·mol/l)Zinc level increased postintervention in both groups and greater in the 30 mg group13.05 ± 1.66 µ·mol/l sigAcuity for salt taste was greater in the 30 mg supplemented group (0·84 409 (SD 0·13 349) 15 and 30 mg Zn did not improve any tastes acuity0·75 045 ± 0·210 sig
Heckmann et al., 2005 [26]Filter paper strips and serum zinc levelT-test for independent samples and correlation (Pearson’s) test72.78 ± 18.38 mg/dlNo significant change in serum zinc level before and after treatments. 81.53 ± 19.6172.01 ± 10.22 not sigThere were significant improvements in the zinc group compared to the placebo group 25.7 ± 6.521.2 ± 5.7 sig
Matson et al., 2003 [27]Filter paper disc method, questionnaire and serum zinc levelUnpaired t-testPlacebo 10.9 ± 1.1_ µ·mol/l Intervention 9.9 ± 1.6 µ·mol/lIntervention 10.4 ± 1.4 µ·mol/lPlacebo 10.5 ± 1.6 µ·mol/lNSNot improvedNot improvedNS
Sakai et al., 2002 [28]A questionnaire, filter paper disc method and serum zinc levelStudent’s t-test and Wilcoxon’s testFor zinc-deficient group ≤69 µg/dl, idiopathic (70 µg/dl ≥Significantly greater increase in serum zinc level after treatment 81.6 µg/dlSerum zinc level after treatment 72.3 µg/dl sigThere was a significant difference between groups in objective improvements in taste 28 patients improved and 9 not improved16 improved and 20 not improved sig
Yoshida et al., 1991 [29]Filter paper disc method and serum zinc levelChi-square testFor zinc-deficient group, 60–69 µg/dl; for idiopathic group, 70 µg/dl or higherSerum zinc concentration was significantly higher during the intervention period, 94.0 ± 24.6 (n = 20)71.9 ± 10.9 (n = 23) sigA significant difference was detected between the two groups in therapeutic efficiency (23 patients improved and 5 unchanged)13 patients improved and 11 unchanged sig
Mahajan et al., 1982 [30]The threshold of taste detection and recognition for salty, sweet and bitter, and serum zinc levelPaired student’s t-testIntervention 81 ± 8 µg/dl
Placebo 82 ± 6 µg/dl
110 ± 14 µg/dl84 ± 9 µg/dl sigImprovedNot improved sig
Mahajan et al., 1980 [31]The threshold of taste detection and recognition for salty, sweet and bitter, and serum zinc levelIndependent student’s t-test for unpaired dataSerum zinc level in treatment group 70 µg/dl, lower than the control groupThe mean plasma zinc level increased significantly from 75 ± 8 to 97 ± 10 µg/dlNo change (75 ± 15 to 80 ± 15) sigSignificant improvement in sweet, salty, and bitter tasteNot improved sig
Mahajan et al., 1979 [32]The threshold of taste detection and recognition for salty, sweet and bitter, and serum zinc levelIndependent student’s t-test for unpaired data75.0 ± 2.0 µg/dl zinc group97.2 ± 3.2 µg/dl zinc groupNRSigImprovedNot improved sig
Atkin-Thor et al., 1978 [33]The threshold of taste detection and recognition for salty, sweet and bitter, and zinc concentration in hairNRZinc concentration in hair before treatment is 2 (10%) where the normal range 180 ± 4 ppm (100%)The serum zinc level was not published in the study; however, zinc concentration in hair increased in 85% of patientsNR sigSignificant improvement in taste acuity in the supplemented group by 95% of patients 6 weeks after treatmentNR sig
Henkin et al., 1976 [34]The threshold of taste detection and recognition for salty, sweet and bitter measured with the total concentration of zinc and copper and a questionnaire of taste acuityStudent’s t-testNRNRNRNRSignificant improvement in taste disorder at 3 monthsNRNR