Research Article
Defining the Ideal Patient with Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Second-Line Treatment
Table 2
Subgroup analysis of ramucirumab, regorafenib, and cabozantinib compared to placebo in HCC.
| | HR | 95% CI | value | I2 (%) | value | Model |
| Age ≥65 years | 0.75 | 0.64–0.88 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.79 | Fixed | Age <65 years | 0.80 | 0.69–0.93 | <0–001 | 9 | 0.35 | | Male | 0.76 | 0.68–0.85 | <0.001 | 27 | 0.25 | Fixed | Female | 0.79 | 0.60–1.05 | 0.10 | 0 | 0.56 | | ECOG: 0 | 0.70 | 0.60–0.80 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.57 | Fixed | ECOG: 1 | 0.88 | 0.75–1.03 | 0.11 | 0 | 0.11 | | Alpha-fetoprotein | | | | | | Fixed | <400 ng/ml | 0.85 | 0.73–1.00 | 0.05 | 68 | 0.05 | | ≥400 ng/ml | 0.70 | 0.69–0.85 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.96 | | Macrovascular invasion | | | | | | Fixed | Yes | 0.75 | 0.62–0.91 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.66 | | No | 0.75 | 0.66–0.86 | <0.001 | 20 | 0.29 | | Extrahepatic metastases | | | | | | Fixed | Yes | 0.70 | 0.62–0.80 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.44 | | No | 1.02 | 0.82–1.27 | 0.86 | 0 | 0.70 | | Virus | | | | | | Fixed | HBV | 0.71 | 0.60–0.84 | <0.001 | 0 | 0.52 | | HCV | 0.89 | 0.72–1.12 | <0.32 | 0 | 0.67 | |
|
|
HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
|