Research Article
Efficacy of Sorafenib Combined with Interventional Therapy on Primary Liver Cancer Patients and Its Effect on Serum AFP, VEGF, and GGT
Table 1
Comparison of patients’ general information.
| Group | Group A (n = 60) | Group B (n = 60) | X2/t | |
| Gender | Male | 52 | 50 | 0.261 | 0.609 | Female | 8 | 10 |
| Age (years) | Range | 34–76 | 35–76 | | | Mean age | 46.32 ± 5.21 | 46.98 ± 5.25 | 0.691 | 0.491 |
| Liver function class | A | 48 | 47 | 0.051 | 0.822 | B | 12 | 13 | | |
| Hepatitis type | Hepatitis C | 10 | 12 | 0.223 | 0.637 | Hepatitis B | 50 | 48 |
| Complication | Ascites | 30 | 32 | 0.134 | 0.715 | Portal vein tumor thrombus | 10 | 9 | 0.063 | 0.803 | Cirrhosis | 42 | 40 | 0.154 | 0.695 |
| TNM staging | II | 24 | 25 | 0.035 | 0.853 | III | 26 | 25 | 0.034 | 0.853 | IV | 10 | 10 | 0.000 | 1.000 |
| Clinical type | Diffused | 10 | 12 | 0.223 | 0.637 | Nodal | 20 | 21 | 0.037 | 0.847 | Massive | 30 | 27 | 0.301 | 0.583 |
| Maximum diameter of tumor (mm) | Range | 50–140 | 48–142 | | | Mean diameter | 85.65 ± 20.65 | 86.98 ± 20.66 | 0.353 | 0.725 |
| ECOG score | 0 point | 35 | 36 | 0.035 | 0.853 | 1 point | 25 | 24 | | |
| Educational degree | Senior high school and below | 22 | 21 | 0.036 | 0.849 | College and above | 38 | 39 |
|
|
The physical health and therapy resistance of patients. |