Research Article

Independent Factors Affecting Postoperative Short-Term Urinary Continence Recovery after Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Table 1

Demographic and clinical characteristics of the analytic cohort.

VariablesAnterior approach (n = 135)Transvesical approach (n = 73)Posterior approach (n = 66)

Age, years, mean (SD)67.6 (7.2)63.4 (7.1)66.5 (7.3)0.001
BMI, kg/m2, mean (SD)22.6 (3.7)23.7 (3.8)25.1 (4.5)0.001
Diabetes mellitus (yes), n (%)34 (25.2%)10 (13.7%)8 (12.1%)0.035
Hypertension (yes), n (%)41 (30.4%)26 (35.6%)27 (40.9%)0.323
ASA score (≥3), n (%)13 (9.6%)5 (6.8%)4 (6.1%)0.621
Preoperative total PSA, ng/mL, mean (SD)24.7 (12.4)19.8 (6.1)17.8 (6.7)0.001
Prostate volume, mL, mean (SD)42.7 (13.7)36.8 (9.6)38.7 (14.2)0.004
Clinical TNM stage, n (%)0.002
 T1c59 (43.7%)28 (38.4%)16 (24.2%)
 T2a-b55 (40.7%)42 (57.5%)44 (66.7%)
 T2c21 (15.6%)3 (4.1%)6 (9.1%)
Biopsy Gleason score, median (IQR)7 (6.8)6 (5.7)6 (5.7)0.001

SD: standard deviation; BMI: body mass index; ASA: American Society of Anesthesiologists; IQR: interquartile range. Continuous variables were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test, and categorical variables were compared using the Chi-square test.