Research Article

Prognosis and Prognostic Factors of Serous Borderline Tumor-Micropapillary Variant: Retrospective Study of 200 Patients with Long-Term Follow-Up

Table 3

Prognostic factors for invasive recurrence in women with SBOT-Ms ().

VariablesInvasive disease-free survival (DFS)
Univariate analysisMultivariate analysis
N. lethal recur./total (%)5-year invasive DFS (%) valueHazard ratio (95% CI) value

Age (years)≤ 3518/125 (14.4)87.165
>355/75 (6.7)93
NulliparousNo4/92 (4.3)95.0091.022
Yes19/108 (17.6)863.5 (1.2-10.4)
Surgical approachLaparotomy17/134 (12.7)88.574
Laparoscopy6/66 (9.1)92
Staging surgeryYes15/127 (11.8)90.774
No8/73 (11.0)89
LymphadenectomyYes7/60 (11.7)93>.999
No16/140 (11.4)89
Surgical extentRadical7/78 (9.0)900.452
Conservative16/122 (13.1)88
Ovarian involvementUnilateral2/63 (3.2)96.0151.112
Bilateral21/137 (15.3)87
FIGO stageI7/106 (6.6)95.0141.029
II-IV16/94 (17.0)831.6 (1.1-2.6)
Stromal microinvasionNo17/164 (10.4)92.221
Yes6/36 (16.7)77
Type of implants ()Noninvasive11/68 (16.2)83.657
Invasive5/26 (19.2)77
ChemotherapyNo13/146 (8.9)93.101
Yes10/54 (18.5)80

FIGO, International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics.