Research Article
A Nomogram Combining MRI Multisequence Radiomics and Clinical Factors for Predicting Recurrence of High-Grade Serous Ovarian Carcinoma
Table 3
The result of Cox regression survival analysis.
| Factors | HR | 95% CI | value |
| FIGO stage (I-II vs. III-IV) | 1.209 | 0.395-3.704 | 0.740 | Residual tumour status (R0 vs. R1) | 2.711 | 1.283-5.728 | 0.009 | PM (absent vs. present) | 1.211 | 0.446-3.288 | 0.707 | Primary treatment (PDS+chemotherapy vs. NACT+IDS) | 0.694 | 0.337-1.427 | 0.321 | Primary treatment CA125 level (<385.0 vs. ≥385.0) | 1.581 | 0.786-3.181 | 0.199 | Primary treatment HE4 level (<470.7 vs. ≥470.7) | 1.175 | 0.681-2.026 | 0.563 | ADC value (<0.855 vs. ≥0.855) | 0.802 | 0.485-1.328 | 0.392 | Tumour composition (cystic, solid, and solid-cystic) | 0.808 | 0.555-1.176 | 0.265 | Multi-Radscore (<-0.286 vs. ≥-0.286) | 2.302 | 1.177-4.503 | 0.015 |
|
|
FIGO: International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics; PM: peritoneal metastasis; PDS: primary debulking surgery; NACT: new adjuvant chemotherapy treatment; IDS: interval debulking surgery; ADC: apparent diffusion coefficient; HR: hazard ratio; CI: confidence interval.
|