Research Article

Association of ERCC1 rs11615 Polymorphism with the Risk of Cervical Cancer Especially in Chinese Populations: A Meta-Analysis

Table 4

The main results of the meta-analysis.

Groups (quantity of studies)Cases/controlsGenetic modelEffects modelTest of associationTest of heterogeneityBegg’sEgger’s
OR95% CI (%)

Overall (6)753/851T vs CRandom1.1990.819-1.7540.35180.20.0001.880.0601.770.152
TT vs CCRandom1.7200.757-3.9080.19572.30.0031.500.1332.980.041
TC vs CCFixed0.9920.800-1.2290.93844.70.1080.750.4521.320.256
TT/CT vs CCRandom1.1400.774-1.6800.50670.20.0051.130.2601.830.142
TT vs CT/CCRandom1.6330.789-3.3790.18766.10.0121.500.1333.000.040

China (4)314/447T vs CFixed1.5571.234-1.9660.0000.00.8061.020.3081.450.283
TT vs CCFixed3.1751.754-5.7480.0000.00.8401.020.3081.170.361
TC vs CCFixed1.3080.958-1.7860.0910.00.8930.340.7340.100.927
TT/CT vs CCFixed1.5121.126-2.0310.0060.00.8960.340.7340.670.571
TT vs CT/CCFixed2.8361.592-5.0510.0000.00.7681.700.0891.150.370

Conform to HWE ()
Overall (4)448/530T vs CRandom1.3951.015-1.9180.04051.90.1011.020.3082.600.121
TT vs CCFixed1.9831.176-3.3440.01030.80.2271.020.3082.040.178
TC vs CCFixed1.1750.895-1.5430.2450.00.561-0.341.0001.450.284
TT/CT vs CCFixed1.2800.989-1.6570.06123.40.2710.340.7342.240.155
TT vs CT/CCFixed1.8551.113-3.0930.01818,50.2981.020.3082.070.174

China (3)219/326T vs CFixed1.6471.244-2.1810.0000.00.7790.001.0000.960.514
TT vs CCFixed3.0041.543-6.0080.0010.00.6821.040.2960.830.558
TC vs CCFixed1.4140.972-2.0580.0700.00.9601.040.296-1.170.450
TT/CT vs CCFixed1.6301.146-2.3190.0070.00.9870.001.0000.800.570
TT vs CT/CCFixed2.6611.374-5.1540.0040.00.6161.040.2960.840.555