The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma

<table class="table-group" id="tab3"><tr><td><table class="table"><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr class="thead"><td class="align_left"> </td><td class="align_center">Sensitivity</td><td class="align_center">Specificity</td><td class="align_center">Accuracy</td><td class="align_center">PPV</td><td class="align_center">NPV</td></tr><tr><td class="thead-hr" colspan="6"><hr/></td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Cirrhosis</td><td class="align_center">50.85% (30/59)</td><td class="align_center">27.39% (43/157)</td><td class="align_center">33.80% (73/216)</td><td class="align_center">20.83% (30/144)</td><td class="align_center">59.72% (43/72)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Arterial peritumoral enhancement</td><td class="align_center">62.71% (37/59)</td><td class="align_center">88.54% (139/157)</td><td class="align_center">81.48% (73/216)</td><td class="align_center">67.27% (37/55)</td><td class="align_center">86.34% (139/161)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Combination of two findings (series connection)</td><td class="align_center">28.81% (17/59)</td><td class="align_center">90.45% (142/157)</td><td class="align_center">73.61% (73/216)</td><td class="align_center">53.13% (17/32)</td><td class="align_center">77.17% (142/184)</td></tr><tr><td class="align_left">Combination of two findings (parallel connection)</td><td class="align_center">84.75% (50/59)</td><td class="align_center">25.48% (40/157)</td><td class="align_center">41.67% (73/216)</td><td class="align_center">29.94% (50/167)</td><td class="align_center">81.63% (40/49)</td></tr><tr class="table-tr"><td colspan="6"><hr class="tbody-hr"/></td></tr></table></td></tr></table>

<div>Diagnostic performance of MR imaging findings in prediction of the tumor type.</div>

Journal of Oncology

tab3

Table 3

Table 3: The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma 

Table 3 | The Value of Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Enhancement in the Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Combined Hepatocellular Cholangiocarinoma 