Research Article
Upregulation of EMID1 Accelerates to a Favorable Prognosis and Immune Infiltration in Lung Adenocarcinoma
Table 3
EMID1 expression associated with clinical pathological characteristics (logistic regression).
| Clinical characteristics | Total (N) | Odds ratio in EMID1 expression | -value |
| Gender (Male VS female) | 522 | 0.66 (0.46,0.93) | 0.019 | Age ( ≥ 65 VS < 65) | 522 | 0.75 (0.52,1.06) | 0.105 | Stage (II. VS I) | 514 | 0.83 (0.54,1.27) | 0.388 | Stage (III. VS I) | 514 | 0.52 (0.32,0.86) | 0.012 | Stage (IV. VS I) | 514 | 0.30 (0.11,0.71) | 0.009 | Tumor status (T2 vs. T1) | 519 | 0.79 (0.54,1.17) | 0.242 | Tumor status (T3 vs. T1) | 519 | 0.50 (0.25,0.96) | 0.041 | Tumor status (T4 vs. T1) | 519 | 0.47 (0.17,1.23) | 0.132 | Distant metastasis (M1 vs. M0) | 378 | 0.37 (0.14,0.87) | 0.030 | Lymph node (N1 vs. N0) | 510 | 0.92 (0.58,1.45) | 0.705 | Lymph node (N2 vs. N0) | 510 | 0.49 (0.28,0.81) | 0.007 |
|
|