Journal of Oncology / 2022 / Article / Tab 3 / Research Article
Comparable Clinical Outcome Using Small or Large Gross Tumor Volume-to-Clinical Target Volume Margin Expansion in Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy for Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma Table 3 Multivariate analysis of clinical outcomes.
Characteristics (comparison vs. reference) Local control Failure-free survival Overall survival HR 95% CI valueHR 95% CI valueHR 95% CI valueAge (continuous) — — — 1.033 1.006–1.061 0.018 1.041 1.011–1.072 0.007 Upper thoracic involvement (yes vs. no) — — — — — — 0.759 0.398–1.445 0.401 Supraclavicular elective irradiation (yes vs. no) — — — 0.671 0.382–1.180 0.166 0.798 0.399–1.593 0.522 Longitudinal length of primary GTV (continuous) — — — 1.106 1.031–1.186 0.005 1.093 1.017–1.174 0.016 Chemotherapy completed (yes vs. no) 0.160 0.046–0.563 0.004 — — — — — — Field size (small margin vs. large margin group) 1.997 0.571–6.980 0.279 1.057 0.650–1.718 0.824 1.268 0.745–2.157 0.382
Abbreviations: HR, hazard ratio; CI, confidence interval; GTV, gross tumor volume.