Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 in Gastric Cancer

Wang, Ling; Wang, Luosha; Yu, Yang; Su, Ruiliang; Zhang, Yating; Li, Yumin; Zang, Mingde

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5734549

Journal of Oncology

On this page

Abstract Introduction Conclusions Disclosure Conflicts of Interest Authors’ Contributions Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Review Article | Open Access

Volume 2022 | Article ID 5734549 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/5734549

Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1 in Gastric Cancer

Ling Wang,^1,2,3,4Luosha Wang,³Yang Yu,^3,4Ruiliang Su,^3,4Yating Zhang,^3,4Yumin Li ,^3,4and Mingde Zang^1,2

Academic Editor: Ozkan Kanat

Received08 Nov 2021

Revised01 Jan 2022

Accepted03 Feb 2022

Published09 Mar 2022

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a disease that threatens human health. It is thus crucial to clarify the mechanisms involved in GC development and discover diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutics. As a cancer stem cell marker, aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) is involved in the development, progression, and treatment of GC. This review evaluated the prognostic value of ALDH1 and explored its mechanism of action in GC. Importantly, ALDH1 is an informative biomarker in clinical practice as it has specific relationships with indicators, such as metastasis and overall survival. Additionally, ALDH1 interacts with genes and exhibits properties that mimic stem cell characteristics amongst other mechanisms employed in the occurrence and progression of GC. Our results, therefore, provide evidence of possible clinical utility of ALDH1 as a GC therapeutic target.

1. Introduction

Gastric cancer (GC) ranks fifth in morbidity and is the third leading cause of death, with 1.0 million diagnosed cases and 783,000 deaths worldwide in 2018 [1]. The incidence of GC is high in East Asia, South America, and the Soviet region, and China has the highest incidence [1]. Moreover, China was ranked second and third for morbidity (29.31/100,000 persons) and mortality (21.16/100,000 persons) in 2015, respectively [2]. In particular, Gansu province has the highest incidence and mortality of GC at 62.37/10,000 persons and 46.27/10,000 persons, respectively [3]. Although there is progress in surgical techniques, chemotherapeutic regimens, radiation, and targeted therapies, the clinical outcomes of patients with GC remain poor. The diagnostic rate of GC in its early stages is low because of the lack of specific symptoms, and diagnosis of advanced GC has limited clinical benefits [4]. In a late-stage unresectable or metastatic disease, which affects approximately 80% of patients, the 5-year survival rate is <5% [5]. Therefore, it is important to elucidate GC pathogenesis and discover diagnostic biomarkers and therapeutic approaches for GC.

Cancer stem cells (CSCs) are involved in the self-renewal, asymmetrical division, differentiation, progression, and resistance of cancer cells [6, 7]. Notably, differentially expressed markers are used to authenticate CSCs [8]. CSCs are relevant in chemotherapy resistance, metastasis, recurrence, and tumor immune microenvironment in GC [9]. Aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), which can be classified into 19 different human ALDH isozymes, are metabolic stem cell markers. ALDHs participate in betaine biosynthesis of retinoic acid and γ-aminobutyric acid, which regulate cellular homeostasis. In addition, ALDHs also oxidize a series of endogenous and exogenous aldehydes to carboxylic acids, protecting them from oxidative stress in living organisms. In stem and progenitor cells, ALDH is derived from normal tissues and its expression is enhanced. Of note, ALDHs are involved in clone growth, self-renewal, drug resistance, and tumor-initiating capacity [10].

As a vital stem-like cell marker, ALDH1 is involved in the oxidation and detoxification of malignant tumors [11]. Although the functions of different ALDH1 isoforms contribute to ALDH1 activity, ALDH1A1 plays a dominant role [12]. In various cancers, as ALDH1 expression increases, self-renewal, proliferation, and carcinogenesis also increase [13, 14]. Of note, ALDH1 is an inhibitor of disulfiram, a well-known drug used to treat alcohol abuse which also has antitumor effects. Thus, hypothetically, it can be utilized in patients with GC in the future [15]. Many studies have verified that ALDH1 is a potential prognostic biomarker for colorectal, lung, and breast cancers [14]. In recent years, the expression of ALDH1 has been detected in GC; therefore, we reviewed the significance of ALDH expression in GC.

2. Clinical Value of ALDH1 in GC

Since 2012, many researchers worldwide have focused on the relationship between ALDH1 expression and GC. In multiple retrospective studies, patients who were pathologically diagnosed with GC but were not receiving radiotherapy or chemotherapy were selected, and gastritis and para-cancer tissues were used as controls. In GC, para-cancer, and noncancerous tissues, the expression of ALDH1 was measured by immunohistochemistry. Different studies included approximately 36–1072 GC cases, and ALDH1 was expressed in 43.9%–100% of cases [16–19]. ALDH1 positivity ranged from 5.77% to 24.1% and 10%–43.4% in noncancerous and para-cancer tissues, respectively [19–21]. ALDH1A1 positivity, respectively, ranged from 43.2% to 89.4% and 10%–43.4% in cancer tissue and in para-cancer tissues [16–21]. In most studies, noncancer tissues or para-cancer tissues were used as the control group. Yang et al. compared the expression of ALDH1 in cancer tissues, para-cancer tissues, and noncancer tissues (43.9%, 10.2%, and 5.77%, respectively) [18]. Therefore, ALDH1 expression was higher in GC tissues than in the noncancer and para-cancer tissues.

Senel et al. found no statistically significant relationship between the expression of ALDH1 and clinicopathologic parameters, recurrence-free survival, or overall survival (OS) [22]. In addition, Yang reported that ALDH1 expression is not correlated with age; sex; tumor, node, metastasis (TNM) stage; Lauren classification; or survival rates in GC [23]. Wakamatsu et al. reported that ALDH1 is related to an advanced T stage, TNM stage, intestinal histology, and a poor 5-year OS [24]. Additionally, Wu et al. found that ALDH1 is associated with age, depth of gastric wall invasion, differentiation, lymph node metastasis, and median OS [17]. Furthermore, Zhang et al. found that ALDH1 is related to lymph node metastasis, tumor differentiation, tumor pTNM stage, and 5-year OS [19]. Although there is a contradiction between the results of these studies, most of the findings are consistent. Therefore, ALDH1 may be a useful diagnostic and prognostic marker for GC.

3. ALDH1 Mechanisms in GC

The pathogenesis of GC is overly complex and may be related to Helicobacter pylori infection, oncogenes, tumor suppressor genes, abnormal differentiation, unnatural cell cycle regulation, and abnormal signaling pathways [25]. Notably, ALDH1A1 also participates in the occurrence and development of GC.

3.1. ALDH1 and H. pylori

Mao et al. concluded that ALDH1 is positively correlated with H. pylori infection. ALDH1 expression and the abundance of Helicobacter pylori were significantly increased in GC tissues than in normal gastric mucosa [26]. Zhao reported that ALDH1 protein expression was increased in the H. pylori-positive cases compared to the H. pylori-negative cases and that there was a positive correlation between ALDH1 expression and positive H. pylori staining. Therefore, H. pylori may be associated with the upregulation of ALDH1 [27]. In H. pylori-associated gastritis, the number of ALDH1-positive cells increased and contributed to the progression of neoplasia in the gastric mucosa. The age-related increase in cancer stem/stem-like cells in the gastric mucosa may explain the increased incidence of GC during aging [28].

3.2. Stem Cell Properties of ALDH1 in GC

Zhang reported that the positive rate of ALDH1 expression was 3.21%, 2.76%, and 1.89% in MKN-45, SGC7901, and MKN28 gastric carcinoma cells, respectively [20]. Wang et al. stated that the positive expression ratio of ALDH1 in MGC-803, BGC-823, and MKN-45 cells was 13.00 ± 1.34%, 5.80 ± 2.15%, and 36.50 ± 5.40%, respectively [29]. Moreover, ALDH1 expression was enhanced in MKN-45 and SGC7901 sphere cells than in typical MKN-45 and SGC7901 cells [30]. The expression of ALDH1 was higher in the peritoneal multicellular aggregates/spheroids of exfoliated GC cells than in scattered-free cancer cells. Multicellular aggregates showed increased efficiency in colony and tumor sphere formation, ALDH1 levels, drug resistance against 5-fluorouracil and oxaliplatin, and number of xenograft tumors. In the ALDH1⁺ cell group, the colony/tumor formation rates in mice were higher, and the sensitivity to 5-fluorouracil was lower [29, 31].

Overexpression of ALDH1A1 in MKN-28, a GC cell line, by the recombinant plasmid, pEGFP-N1-ALDH1A1, can increase the proliferation, colony formation, and invasion ability of cancer cells [32, 33]. In patients with GC and ascites, the level of ALDH1 was significantly higher than that in patients with a benign disease. The high expression of ALDH1 in GC cells can assist them in escaping the killing effect of macrophages by antagonizing tumor necrosis factor alpha and other effector molecules secreted by macrophages, resulting in increased proliferation and invasion capacity [34]. The high ALDH1 expression in GC cells (SGC7901) improves stem cell characteristics and antagonizes the effects of macrophages, thus affecting the cells’ survival rate, anti-apoptosis, invasion, migration, and cloning abilities.

Using small interfering RNA interference, the expression of ALDH1A1 was downregulated in the GC cell line MKN-45. ALDH1A1 can inhibit the proliferation, colony formation, and invasion abilities of these cells and downregulate the expression of matrix metallopeptidases 2 and 9, Wnt1, Wnt5, and ß-catenin in MKN-45 cells. Importantly, ALDH1A1 silencing can decrease cell viability and inhibit cell migration and invasion via regulation of the Wnt signaling pathway in MKN-45 cells [35, 36].

These results support that, in GC, ALDH1+ cells have stem cell properties, and the growth of GC cells is repressed on inhibition of ALDH1 expression.

3.3. ALDH1 Interacts with Genes in GC

Studies on GC have focused on abnormal cell energy metabolism, self-sufficient growth signals, genomic instability and mutation, insensitivity to anti-growth signals, avoidance of immune surveillance, tissue invasion and metastasis, resistance to cell death, continuous angiogenesis, unlimited replication capacity, and promotion of tumor inflammation [37]. Many genes, proteins, and signaling pathways are involved in these processes.

Rorβ, a hormone receptor in Choristoneura, is upregulated and promotes cell differentiation in GC, and in one study, ALDH1 and Wnt pathways were inhibited when Rorβ was highly expressed in 200 GC tissues [38]. Moreover, cancer testis 45 antigen A1 is upregulated in GC tissues, and its overexpression upregulates the expression of ALDH1A3 in HGC-27 cells and promotes the development and metastasis of GC [39]. Furthermore, high mobility group protein A2 (HMGA2) is upregulated in GC and is related to poor prognosis. In one study, ALDH1 expression was increased in HMGA2-overexpressing GC stem cells (MKN-74 and MKN-28) but was decreased in human GC cells (MKN-45 and MGC803 cells) when HMGA2 was knocked down. Of note, HMGA2 promotes the self-renewal of GCSCs [40]. Progestin and adipoQ receptor 3 is downregulated and negatively related to tumor size, stage, and OS in GC, and its overexpression in BGC-823 cells leads to decreased ALDH1A1 expression [41]. A transcriptional coactivator with a PDZ-binding motif (TAZ) is upregulated in GC and is related to an advanced TNM stage and poor prognosis. Overexpression of TAZ upregulated the expression of ALDH1 in MKN28 and MGC803 cells, suggesting that the expression of TAZ can promote the occurrence of epithelial to mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell and then promote the formation of vasculogenic mimicry [42].

Bromodomain and extra-terminal domain protein 4 (BRD4) was dramatically augmented in GC tissues compared to normal adjacent tissues [43]. One study reported that BRD4 was negatively correlated with OS and first and postprogression survival of patients with GC. BRD4 was knocked down in MGC-803 and BGC-823 GC cells, and the expression and activity of ALDH1 were significantly decreased. It also inhibited Wnt/β-catenin signaling by attenuating miR-216a-3p and promoted the stemness of GC cells [43]. Testis-associated highly conserved oncogenic long noncoding RNA was significantly increased and related to stemness markers in GC and when it was stably knocked out in MKN-45 cells, ALDH1 expression and globule formation capacity were decreased [44]. Silencing miR-95 or overexpressing the miR‐95 inhibitor (dual-specificity phosphatase 5) suppressed ALDH1 expression and tumor sphere formation in GC cells (BGC803), and GC development was inhibited via the dual-specificity phosphatase 5‐dependent mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway mediated by miR‐95 knockdown [45]. miR-625 silencing resulted in increased ALDH1A1 expression and luciferase activity of the wild-type ALDH1A1 construct. In SGC7901/adriamycin amycin cells and SGC7901/vincristine cells, the downregulation of miR-625 elevated the mRNA and protein levels of ALDH1A1. Therefore, ALDH1A1 may be a direct target of miR-625. When ALDH1 was depleted, the miR-625 silencing-increased IC50 values for the four tested chemotherapeutic agents (adriamycin amycin, vincristine, 5 fluorouracil, and cis-dichlorodiammine platinum) were reversed. In contrast, when ALDH1A1 was overexpressed, the reduced resistance to multiple drugs caused by miR-625 overexpression was mainly resumed. Hence, ALDH1A1 is a crucial target of miR-625-associated reversal of this multidrug resistance in GC cells [46]. ALDH1+ cells were able to self‐renew and generate heterogeneous cell populations and were more tumorigenic than ALDH1− cells in diffuse-type gastric carcinoma cells. In human diffuse-type gastric carcinoma cells (OCUM‐2MLN and HSC‐39), regenerating islet‐derived family member 4 (REG4) is upregulated in ALDH1+ cancer-initiating cells. Transforming growth factor beta downregulated REG4 and ALDH1 expression, which is related to the decline in cancer-initiating cell population size and tumorigenicity. It was concluded that the enhanced tumorigenic ability of ALDH1+ cells depended on REG4 [47]. Taken together, as a stem cell marker, ALDH1 is involved in the regulation of various genes and proteins in the occurrence and development of GC.

3.4. ALDH1 and GC Therapy

Surgical treatment after early diagnosis of GC has a good prognosis, but most GCs are diagnosed in the middle and late stages, and the opportunity for surgery is lost. Chemotherapy is currently the predominant therapy of advanced GC; however, there are patients with poor sensitivity to existing chemotherapy drugs. Therefore, it is necessary to identify new therapeutic drugs and treatment regimens that can be used clinically.

In MKN-45 tumor spheres, approximately 35% of cells expressed ALDH1, and this percentage was significantly suppressed gradually from 2 to 5 days of all-trans retinoic acid treatment. In diffuse and intestinal types of gastric carcinoma, all-trans retinoic acid appears to repress tumor growth and, more importantly, target GCSCs [48]. Verteporfin weakened the CSC pool of GC cell lines and interfered with their capacity to grow into tumor spheres in vitro. The number of ALDH+ cells dramatically reduced with 1 μM verteporfin treatment in MKN-45 tumor spheres [49]. In advanced GC, Xiao-ai-ping combined with intravenous chemotherapy could more efficiently kill cancer cells and inhibit cancer cell proliferation and invasion. ALDH1 expression was significantly lower in the GC tissues from the Xiao-ai-ping group [50]. GC cells (NCI–N87 and SNU-1) with a high expression of ALDH1 exhibited increased CSC characteristics, colony formation, floating spheroid bodies, and resistance to conventional chemotherapeutic 5 fluorouracil and cis-dichlorodiammine platinum. Salinomycin efficiently killed ALDH stem-like cells in GC [51]. 7-Difluoromethoxyl-5,4′-di-n-octyl genistein restrained the stem-like characteristics of GC cells and reversed the epithelial-mesenchymal transition phenotype by modulating FoxM1 and Twist1 expressions. FoxM1 siRNA transfection cooperated with 7-difluoromethoxyl-5,4′-di-n-octyl genistein inhibited cell migration, self-renewal capacity, cell invasion, and the expression of ALDH1 [52]. Taken together, drugs inhibit the growth of GC and reverse drug resistance by repressing the expression of ALDH1; thus, ALDH1 may be a therapeutic target.

4. Conclusions and Prospects

ALDH1 is highly expressed in GC tissues and cell lines and may be related to differentiation, TNM stage, prognosis, cell growth, and invasion. As a CSC marker, the expression of ALDH1 is inhibited by nucleotides, proteins, or drugs, leading to the inhibition of GC cell growth by inhibiting the characteristics of GC stem cells. ALDH1 inhibitors may also be used in the clinical treatment of GC. Therefore, ALDH1 can be used as a therapeutic target to evaluate the prognosis of GC.

Disclosure

Ling Wang and Luosha Wang are co-first authors.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Authors’ Contributions

Yumin Li and Mingde Zang conceived and supervised the study; Ling Wang, Luosha Wang, Ruiliang Su, and Yating Zhang collected the included studies and analyzed the data; Ling Wang and Luosha Wang wrote the manuscript; and Yang Yu and Mingde Zang made manuscript revisions. All authors reviewed the results and approved the final version of the manuscript. Ling Wang and Luosha Wang contributed equally to this work.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the members of the Key Laboratory of Digestive System Tumors of Gansu Province. This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant nos. 31770537 and 81902403) and the International Science and Technology Cooperation Project of Gansu Province (Grant no. 18YF1WA113).

References

F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R. L. Siegel, L. A. Torre, and A. Jemal, “Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries,” CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, vol. 68, no. 6, pp. 394–424, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. M. Wang, R. S. Zheng, and S. W. Zhang, “Epidemiological characteristics of gastric cancer in China, 2015,” Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi, vol. 40, no. 12, pp. 1517–1521, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
W. Y. Liu, Y. T. Zhu, and L. N. Yang, “Cancer incidence and mortality in Gansu cancer registries,” China Cancer, vol. 27, no. 04, pp. 246–255, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
R. Tsunedomi, K. Yoshimura, N. Suzuki, S. Hazama, and H. Nagano, “Clinical implications of cancer stem cells in digestive cancers: acquisition of stemness and prognostic impact,” Surgery Today, vol. 50, no. 12, pp. 1560–1577, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. B. Piazuelo and P. Correa, “Gastric cancer: overview,” Colombia Médica, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 192–201, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
B. B. Liau, C. Sievers, L. K. Donohue et al., “Adaptive chromatin remodeling drives glioblastoma stem cell plasticity and drug tolerance,” Cell Stem Cell, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 233–246, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Ricci-Vitiani, D. G. Lombardi, E. Pilozzi et al., “Identification and expansion of human colon-cancer-initiating cells,” Nature, vol. 445, no. 7123, pp. 111–115, 2007.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. Huang, X. Li, R. Holm, C. G. Trope, J. M. Nesland, and Z. Suo, “The expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 (ALDH1) in ovarian carcinomas and its clinicopathological associations: a retrospective study,” BMC Cancer, vol. 15, no. 1, p. 502, 2015.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
L. Fu, L. Bu, T. Yasuda et al., “Gastric cancer stem cells: current insights into the immune microenvironment and therapeutic targets,” Biomedicines, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 7, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
G. Vassalli, “Aldehyde dehydrogenases: not just markers, but functional regulators of stem cells,” Stem Cells International, vol. 2019, Article ID 3904645, 15 pages, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. P. Chute, G. G. Muramoto, J. Whitesides et al., “Inhibition of aldehyde dehydrogenase and retinoid signaling induces the expansion of human hematopoietic stem cells,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, vol. 103, no. 31, pp. 11707–11712, 2006.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Tomita, K. Tanaka, T. Tanaka, and A. Hara, “Aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 in stem cells and cancer,” Oncotarget, vol. 7, no. 10, pp. 11018–11032, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Q.-Z. He, X.-Z. Luo, K. Wang et al., “Isolation and characterization of cancer stem cells from high-grade serous ovarian carcinomas,” Cellular Physiology and Biochemistry, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 173–184, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Ekinci, S. Rohondia, R. Khan, and Q. P. Dou, “Repurposing disulfiram as an anti-cancer agent: updated review on literature and patents,” Recent Patents on Anti-Cancer Drug Discovery, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 113–132, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Han, T. Huang, X. Wu et al., “Prognostic value of ALDH1 and Nestin in advanced cancer: a systematic meta-analysis with trial sequential analysis,” Therapeutic advances in medical oncology, vol. 11, pp. 1–15, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Brungs, A. Lochhead, A. Iyer et al., “Expression of cancer stem cell markers is prognostic in metastatic gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma,” Pathology, vol. 51, no. 5, pp. 474–480, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. L. Wu, Y. M. Wang, and G. F. Wang, “Expression of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1A1 in human gastric cancer and its clinical significance,” Chinese Clinical Oncology, vol. 19, no. 11, pp. 992–995, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
J. E. Yang, L. L. Li, and Q. F. Shi, “Expression and significance of aldehyde dehydrogenase1A1 and epidermal growth factor receptor in gastric adenocarcinoma,” The Chinese Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, vol. 36, no. 05, pp. 499–502, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
C. L. Zhang and Y. M. Yang, “Expression of CD44 and ALDH1 in gastric cancer and its correlation with clinical features,” Health Vocational Education, vol. 35, no. 24, pp. 150–152, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Zhang, “ALDH1A1+CD44+ gastric cancer cells population is associated with tumor stem cells property,” Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, China, 2012.
View at: Google Scholar
A. M. Wan and D. Li, “Expression of forkhead box protein C1 in gastric cancer and its relationship with clinical prognosis,” Laboratory Medicine and Clinic, vol. 16, no. 09, pp. 1215–1217, 2019.
View at: Google Scholar
F. Senel, T. D. Kokenek Unal, and H. Karaman, “Prognostic value of cancer stem cell markers CD44 and ALDH1/2 in gastric cancer cases,” Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention, vol. 18, no. 9, pp. 2527–2531, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
L. Yang, “Isolation and identification of gastric cancer stem cells and their roles and molecular mechanisms in invasion and metastasis of gastric cancer,” The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China, 2013.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Wakamatsu, N. Sakamoto, H. Z. Oo et al., “Expression of cancer stem cell markers ALDH1, CD44 and CD133 in primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of gastric cancer,” Pathology International, vol. 62, no. 2, pp. 112–119, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. He, Y. S. Mao, and K. Shen, Clinical Oncology, Human Life and Health Press, Beijing, China, 2016.
X. L. Mao and X. Wu, “Relationship between expression of ALDHL and c-myc in gastric cancer tissue and L-type infection of Helicobacter pylori,” Basic and Clinical Medicine, vol. 36, no. 10, pp. 1422–1424, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
Y. Zhao, X. Jin, and D. H. Yu, “Expression of ALDH1 in gastric carcinoma and its relationship with helicobacterpyloril-form in fection,” Acta Medicine University Science Technology Huazhong, vol. 43, no. 6, pp. 649–652, 2014.
View at: Google Scholar
E. Levi, P. Sochacki, N. Khoury, B. B. Patel, and A. P. Majumdar, “Cancer stem cells in Helicobacter pylori infection and aging: implications for gastric carcinogenesis,” World Journal of Gastrointestinal Pathophysiology, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 366–372, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Yi, D. D. Liu, and Y. P. Xiang, “Expression of ALDH1 on surface of gastric cancer cells and identification of stem cell characteristics of ALDH1+ cells,” China Journal of Modern Medicine, vol. 28, no. 22, pp. 0001–06, 2018.
View at: Google Scholar
X. Wang, F. Zou, H. Deng et al., “Characterization of sphere-forming cells with stem-like properties from the gastric cancer cell lines MKN45 and SGC7901,” Molecular Medicine Reports, vol. 10, no. 6, pp. 2937–2941, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. Wu, Analyzation of Highly Active ALDH Isoforms in Gastric Cancer Cell Lines and its Expression proIlIe Ln Gastric Cancer tissue, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2015.
C. L. Wu, Y. M. Wang, and G. F. Wang, “Constuction and identification of pEGFP-N1-ALDH1A1 eukaryotic expression vector,” Chinese Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 10, pp. 865–869, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
C. L. Wu, Y. M. Wang, and G. F. Wang, “Influence of ALDH1A1 overexpression on biological behavior of gastric cancer cells,” Chinese Clinical Oncology, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 18–21, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
G. Q. Zhang, The Effects of High Expression of ALDH1 in Gastric Tumor Cells Escaping the Killing by Mφ, Bengbu Medical College, Bengbu, China, 2020.
C. L. Wu, X. H. Yu, and Y. M. Wang, “The impact on the biological function of gastric cancer cell with down-regulating expression of ALDH1A1,” Chinese Clinical Oncology, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 497–500, 2015.
View at: Google Scholar
H. Jiang, X. Song, and Z. G. Sun, “Effect of ALDH1A1 on biological behavior of gastric cancer cells through Wnt signaling pathway,” Chinese Journal of Public Health, vol. 32, no. 10, pp. 1333–1336, 2016.
View at: Google Scholar
D. Hanahan and R. A. Weinberg, “Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation,” Cell, vol. 144, no. 5, pp. 646–674, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. J. Feng, Effects of Interaction between Rorβ and Nrip2 on the Expression of EMT-Related Transcripition Factors in Gastric Cancer, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 2015.
Y. Kong, The Role and Mechanism of CT45A1 Promoting Gastric Cancer Cells Genesis and Malignant Progression, Suzhou University, Suzhou, China, 2018.
Y. Wang, Effect of Lentivirus-Mediated Overexpression of PAQR3 Gene on Biological Behavior and Stem Cell Characteristics of Gastric Cancer, Jinzhou Medical University, Jinzhou, China, 2018.
J. R. Bai, The Mechanism of TAZ on the Regulation of Vasculogenic Mimicry in Gastric Cancer, Tianjin Medical University, Tianjin, China, 2019.
H. Song, L. Shi, Y. Xu et al., “BRD4 promotes the stemness of gastric cancer cells via attenuating miR-216a-3p-mediated inhibition of Wnt/β-catenin signaling,” European Journal of Pharmacology, vol. 852, pp. 189–197, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Xu, S. Hu, and J. Song, “Expression of THOR in gastric cancer cells and its influence on stemness of gastric cancer cells,” Journal of Modern Clinical Medicine, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 249–252, 2020.
View at: Google Scholar
M. Du, Y. Zhuang, P. Tan, Z. Yu, X. Zhang, and A. Wang, “microRNA‐95 knockdown inhibits epithelial-mesenchymal transition and cancer stem cell phenotype in gastric cancer cells through MAPK pathway by upregulating DUSP5,” Journal of Cellular Physiology, vol. 235, no. 2, pp. 944–956, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Gong, B. Xu, L. Zi, and X. Chen, “miR-625 reverses multidrug resistance in gastric cancer cells by directly targeting ALDH1A1,” Cancer Management and Research, vol. 11, pp. 6615–6624, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
Y. Katsuno, S. Ehata, M. Yashiro, K. Yanagihara, K. Hirakawa, and K. Miyazono, “Coordinated expression of REG4 and aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 regulating tumourigenic capacity of diffuse-type gastric carcinoma-initiating cells is inhibited by TGF-β,” The Journal of Pathology, vol. 228, no. 3, pp. 391–404, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. H. Nguyen, J. Giraud, C. Staedel et al., “All-trans retinoic acid targets gastric cancer stem cells and inhibits patient-derived gastric carcinoma tumor growth,” Oncogene, vol. 35, no. 43, pp. 5619–5628, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Giraud, S. Molina‐Castro, L. Seeneevassen et al., “Verteporfin targeting YAP1/TAZ‐TEAD transcriptional activity inhibits the tumorigenic properties of gastric cancer stem cells,” International Journal of Cancer, vol. 146, no. 8, pp. 2255–2267, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. X. Zhou, Y. Xu, and C. Zhou, “Effect of Xiaoaiping combined with intravenous chemotherapy on tumor marker levels and cell viability molecule expression in patients with advanced gastric cancer,” Journal of Hainan Medical University, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 411–414, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar
Q. M. Zhi, X. H. Chen, J. Ji et al., “Salinomycin can effectively kill ALDHhigh stem-like cells on gastric cancer,” Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy, vol. 65, no. 7, pp. 509–515, 2011.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
X. Cao, K. Ren, Z. Song et al., “7-Difluoromethoxyl-5,4′-di-n-octyl genistein inhibits the stem-like characteristics of gastric cancer stem-like cells and reverses the phenotype of epithelial-mesenchymal transition in gastric cancer cells,” Oncology Reports, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 1157–1165, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Sun, B. Sun, and D. Zhu, “HMGA2 regulates CD44 expression to promote gastric cancer cell motility and sphere formation,” American Journal of Cancer Research, vol. 7, no. 2, pp. 260–274, 2017.
View at: Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2022 Ling Wang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies