Research Article
Capecitabine Monotherapy as Palliative Treatment for Patients with Recurrent/Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Cancer
Table 3
Regression analysis of variables associated with an objective response rate of capecitabine in R/M NPC.
| Variables | Univariate analysis | OR | 95% CI | -value |
| ECOG-PS 0/1 vs. 2 | 1.26 | 0.39–4.06 | 0.69 | De novo metastases vs. relapsed | 0.67 | 0.22–2.04 | 0.48 | Sites of metastasis | | | | Lung vs. others | 1.07 | 0.35–3.23 | 0.89 | Liver vs. others | 0.80 | 0.24–2.53 | 0.69 | Bone vs. others | 0.67 | 0.22–2.04 | 0.49 | Brain vs. others | 0.29 | 0.02–3.02 | 0.30 | 1st/2nd line vs. subsequent lines | 1.07 | 0.35–3.24 | 0.90 | Starting dose | 0.41 | 0.13–1.28 | 0.12 | Lower vs. standard dose a | | | | Highest achieve dose | | | | Standard dose vs. lower dose | 1.32 | 0.34-5.06 | 0.67 | History of smoking vs. none | 0.13 | 0.02–0.8 | 0.02 | Development of HFS vs. none | 5.5 | 1.29–23.3 | 0.02 |
|
|
aLower starting dose are 850 mg/m2 or 1000 mg/m2 and standard dose is 1250 mg/m2. Abbreviations: CI: confidence interval; ECOG-PS: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status; HFS: hand-foot syndrome; NPC: nasopharyngeal carcinoma; OR: odds ratio; R/M: recurrent/metastatic.
|