Research Article
SFRP4 Is a Potential Biomarker for the Prognosis and Immunotherapy for Gastric Cancer
Table 4
Univariate analysis of prognostic parameters for survival in gastric cancer patients.
| Variable | Univariable analysis | HR (95% CI) | valuec |
| SFRP4 (high vs. low) | 1.875 (1.085–3.240) | 0.024 | Age (years) (≥65 vs. <65) | 0.806 (0.509–1.276) | 0.358 | Sex (female vs. male) | 1.245 (0.759–2.040) | 0.385 | Smoking (yes vs. no) | 1.191 (0.743–1.911) | 0.468 | Drinking (yes vs. no) | 1.179 (0.699–1.990) | 0.537 | Weight loss (yes vs. no) | 1.226 (0.771–1.951) | 0.390 | Family history (yes vs. no) | 2.258 (1.274–4.004) | 0.005 | Tumor location | Total stomach (ref) | Ref | Distal gastric cancer | 0.355 (0.159–0.793) | 0.011 | Proximal gastric cancer | 0.347 (0.148–0.818) | 0.015 | Borrmann type (I/II vs. III/IV) | 0.587 (0.369–0.933) | 0.024 | Lauren type | Mixed (ref) | Ref | Diffuse | 0.660(0.334–1.305) | 0.232 | Intestinal | 0.494(0.255–0.956) | 0.036 | Grade of differentiation (poor/well vs. moderate-poor/moderate) | 0.957(0.597–1.533) | 0.854 | Pathological type (signet ring cell carcinoma/mucinous adenocarcinoma vs. adenocarcinoma) | 0.680 (0.295–1.570) | 0.367 | Tumor size (cm) (≥5 cm vs. <5 cm) | 1.358 (0.816–2.263) | 0.239 | T stage (T1/T2 vs. T3/T4) | 0.369 (0.090–1.507) | 0.165 | N stage (N0 vs. N1/n2/n3) | 0.655 (0.205–2.092) | 0.475 | M stage (M0 vs. M1) | 0.266 (0.141–0.503) | <0.001 | TNM stage (I/II/III vs. IV) | 0.266 (0.141–0.503) | <0.001 | Nerve invasion (positive vs. negative) | 1.583 (0.884–2.838) | 0.123 | Vascular invasion (positive vs. negative) | 2.046 (1.240–3.377) | 0.005 | AFP (ng/ml) (>8.1 vs. ≤8.1) | 1.243 (0.538–2.870) | 0.610 | CA19-9 (U/ml) (>37 vs. ≤37) | 1.469 (0.929–2.324) | 0.222 | PD-L1 (positive vs. negative) | 1.071 (0.662–1.733) | 0.779 | CD3 (high vs. low) | 0.646 (0.406–1.028) | 0.065 | CD4 (high vs. low) | 0.538 (0.337–0.858) | 0.009 | CD8 (high vs. low) | 0.625 (0.393–0.995) | 0.048 |
|
|
cStatistically significant ( ). |