Research Article
FECH Expression Correlates with the Prognosis and Tumor Immune Microenvironment in Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma
Table 2
Logistic regression analysis of FECH expression.
| Characteristics | Total (N) | Odds ratio (OR) | -Value |
| T stage (T3 and T4 vs. T1 and T2) | 539 | 0.435 (0.301–0.623) | <0.001 | N stage (N1 vs. N0) | 257 | 1.078 (0.385–3.019) | 0.885 | M stage (M1 vs. M0) | 506 | 0.501 (0.300–0.820) | 0.007 | Pathologic stage (Stage III and Stage IV vs. Stage I and Stage II) | 536 | 0.407 (0.284–0.582) | <0.001 | Primary therapy outcome (SD and PR and CR vs. PD) | 147 | 3.927 (1.083–18.531) | 0.050 | Histologic grade (G3 and G4 vs. G1 and G2) | 531 | 0.600 (0.425–0.845) | 0.004 | Age (>60 vs. ≤60) | 539 | 0.856 (0.610–1.199) | 0.366 | Gender (male vs. female) | 539 | 0.882 (0.618–1.258) | 0.488 | Laterality (right vs. left) | 538 | 1.076 (0.767–1.511) | 0.670 |
|
|