Research Article

The Association between Self-Reported Energy Intake and Intra-Abdominal Adipose Tissue in Perimenopausal Women

Table 2

Multivariable models of association between self-reported energy intake and intra-abdominal adipose tissue.

ParametersModel 1*Model 2**Model 3***
Estimatea š‘ƒ -valueEstimatea š‘ƒ -valueEstimatea š‘ƒ -value

Lifestyle factors
ā€ƒEnergy intake, for every 500 kcal/day0.0580.0250.0580.0250.1190.001
ā€ƒPhysical activity (KPAS score)ā€”ā€”āˆ’0.0380.016āˆ’0.0350.024
Confounders
ā€ƒAfrican American versus Caucasian women–0.183<0.001āˆ’0.204<0.0010.1820.170
ā€ƒPostmenopausal versus pre-/perimenopausal women0.1060.0540.1150.0350.1240.023
ā€ƒEnergy intake*ethnicity interactionā€”ā€”ā€”ā€”āˆ’0.1200.018
Correction factors
ā€ƒPercent body fat, for every 5%0.192<0.0010.183<0.0010.186<0.001
ā€ƒPercent body fat2āˆ’0.0220.001āˆ’0.0240.001āˆ’0.0240.001
ā€ƒAge0.0100.2620.0100.3070.0110.241
ā€ƒAge20.0040.0410.0050.0230.0040.038
ā€ƒCurrent smoking0.1510.0170.1160.0750.1290.045
ā€ƒIncome
ā€ƒā€ƒLower than $50,000āˆ’0.0530.457āˆ’0.0350.632āˆ’0.0490.496
ā€ƒā€ƒ$50,000 to $75,000āˆ’0.0520.405āˆ’0.0340.579āˆ’0.0410.504

š‘… 2 56%57%58%

a l o g a r i t h m i c a l l y transformed intra-abdominal adipose tissue area in cm2 (log IAT).
āˆ— M o d e l 1 was adjusted for risk groups (ethnicity, menopausal status), income, age and percent body fat.
āˆ— āˆ— M o d e l 2 was adjusted the same as Model 1 plus low physical activity (Kaiser Physical Activity Survey score) and smoking status.
āˆ— āˆ— āˆ— M o d e l 3 was adjusted the same as Model 2 plus energy intake*ethnicity interaction.