Research Article
Linkage between Neighborhood Social Cohesion and BMI of South Asians in the Masala Study
Table 1
Characteristics of the MASALA study participants by neighborhood social cohesion, 2010–2013, N = 906.
| | Women (N = 420) | Men (N = 486) | Lowest tertile (N = 151) | Middle tertile (N = 149) | Highest tertile (N = 120) | Total | value | Lowest tertile (N = 151) | Middle tertile (N = 207) | Highest tertile (N = 128) | Total | value | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) | N (%) |
| Age, mean (SD) | 55.58 (9.28) | 54.53 (8.50) | 52.63 (7.68) | 54.37 (8.63) | 0.0185 | 57.36 (9.47) | 54.92 (9.90) | 56.69 (10.35) | 56.14 (9.93) | 0.0555 | BMI, mean (SD) | 27.34 (4.19) | 26.43 (4.35) | 25.85 (4.02) | 26.59 (4.30) | 0.0156 | 26.29 (4.19) | 26.08 (3.35) | 26.60 (4.23) | 26.28 (3.87) | 0.4873 | Income | | | | | 0.0013 | | | | | 0.0133 | Less than $50,000 | 38 (26.21) | 20 (13.89) | 12 (10.26) | 70 (17.24) | | 39 (27.08) | 28 (13.66) | 18 (14.4) | 85 (17.93) | | $50,000 to $99,999 | 33 (22.76) | 29 (20.14) | 19 (16.24) | 81 (19.95) | | 27 (18.75) | 39 (19.02) | 22 (17.6) | 88 (18.57) | | $100,000 or more | 74 (51.03) | 95 (65.97) | 86 (73.50) | 255 (62.81) | | 78 (54.17) | 138 (67.32) | 85 (68) | 301 (63.5) | | Education | | | | | 0.0036 | | | | | | Less than a bachelor’s degree | 35 (23.18) | 15 (10.07) | 12 (10.0) | 62 (14.76) | | 17 (11.26) | 21 (10.14) | 10 (7.81) | 48 (9.88) | | Bachelor’s degree | 49 (32.45) | 45 (30.20) | 44 (36.67) | 138 (32.86) | | 50 (33.11) | 49 (23.67) | 24 (18.75) | 123 (25.31) | | More than a bachelor’s degree | 67 (44.37) | 89 (59.73) | 64 (53.33) | 220 (52.38) | | 84 (55.63) | 137 (66.18) | 94 (73.44) | 315 (64.81) | | Marriage | | | | | 0.0234 | | | | | 0.0387 | Married or living as married | 120 (79.47) | 133 (89.26) | 107 (89.17) | 360 (85.71) | | 141 (93.38) | 202 (97.58) | 126 (98.44) | 469 (96.5) | | Others | 31 (20.53) | 16 (10.74) | 13 (10.83) | 60 (14.29) | | 10 (6.62) | 5 (2.42) | 2 (1.56) | 17 (3.5) | |
|
|
Missing for 3 participants (one woman and two men). Missing for 26 participants (14 women and 12 men). . |