Review Article

First-Hand Recommendations for Nursing Management to Support Nurses Involved in the Process of Hastened Death: A Systematic Review of the Qualitative Evidence

Table 1

Appraisal of study quality and assessment of dependability.

StudyQ1Q2Q3Q4Q5Q6Q7Q8Q9Q10Dependability score

Bellens et al. [27]UYYYYYYYYY5
Beuthin et al. [28]UYNYUNNYYY2
Bruce and Beuthin [29]UYNYUNNNYY2
Castelli Dransart et al. [30]UYYUYNNYYY2
Denier et al. [31]UYYYYNYYYY4
Denier et al. [32]UYYYYNYYYY4
Denier et al. [33]UYYYYNYYYY4
Dierckx de Casterlé et al. [34]UYYYYNYYYY4
Ho et al. [35]UYYYYYNYYY4
Mathews et al. [39]YYYYYYYUYY5
Mills et al. [36]UYYYYYYYYY5
Mills et al. [37]UYYYYYYUYY5
Pesut et al. [40]YYYYYNYYYY4
Pesut et al. [41]YYYYYNYYYY4
Pesut, Thorne Tishelman [42]YYYYYNYYYY4
van de Scheur and van der Arend [38]UYYYYNNYYY3

Note: Y = yes; N = no; U = unclear; dependability scores derived from Q2, 3, 4, 6, and 7. JBI critical appraisal checklist for qualitative research [23]. Q1: Is there congruity between the stated philosophical perspective and the research methodology? Q2: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the research question or objectives? Q3: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the methods used to collect data? Q4: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the representation and analysis of data? Q5: Is there congruity between the research methodology and the interpretation of results? Q6: Is there a statement locating the researcher culturally or theoretically? Q7: Is the influence of the researcher on the research, and vice versa, addressed? Q8: Are participants, and their voices, adequately represented? Q9: Is the research ethical according to current criteria or, for recent studies, and is there evidence of ethical approval by an appropriate body? Q10: Do the conclusions drawn in the research report flow from the analysis, or interpretation, of the data?