Effectiveness of Individual-Based Strategies to Reduce Nurse Burnout: An Umbrella Review

Table 2

Quality appraisal of included systematic reviews using JBI (n = 11).

Citation

Q1

Q2

Q3

Q4

Q5

Q6

Q7

Q8

Q9

Q10

Q11

No. of questions met

[10]

O

O

O

X

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

9

[25]

O

O

O

X

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

9

[14]

O

X

U

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

8

[15]

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

10

[26]

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

10

[12]

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

10

[27]

O

X

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

9

[13]

O

O

O

X

O

O

O

O

O

O

O

10

[28]

O

X

O

O

X

X

O

O

N/A

O

O

7

[9]

O

X

O

O

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

9

[11]

O

O

O

X

O

O

O

O

N/A

O

O

9

% meeting criteria

100

63.6

90.9

63.6

90.9

90.9

100

100

9.1

100

100

Range 7–10

Note. Met appraisal question (O)/not meet appraisal question (X)/unclear (U)/not applicable (N/A); Question of checklist: (1) Is the review question clear and explicitly stated? (2) Were the inclusion criteria appropriate for the review question? (3) Was the search strategy appropriate? (4) Were the sources and resources used to search for studies adequate? (5) Were the criteria for appraising studies appropriate? (6) Was critical appraisal conducted by two or more reviewers independently? (7) Were there methods to minimize errors in data extraction? (8) Were the methods used to combine studies appropriate? (9) Was the likelihood of publication bias assessed? (10) Were recommendations for policy and/or practice supported by the reported data? (11) Were the specific directives for new research appropriate?