Research Article

Comparison of Optical Coherence Tomography Angiography and Laser Speckle Flowgraphy for the Diagnosis of Normal-Tension Glaucoma

Table 5

Comparison of parameters using the area under receiver operating characteristics curve and sensitivities at fixed specificities.

Normal versus normal-tension glaucoma
AUROC (SE)Sn/Sp (Sp > 90%)

OCT-A whole image vessel density0.950 (0.027)82.14/92.00
OCT-A inside disc vessel density0.931 (0.034)78.57/92.00
OCT-A peripapillary vessel density0.830 (0.056)60.71/92.00
LSFG MBRA0.793 (0.065)60.71/92.00
LSFG MBRV0.601 (0.079)21.43/92.00
LSFG MBRT0.601 (0.079)28.57/92.00
GCC thickness0.970 (0.021)92.86/92.00
RNFL thickness0.906 (0.039)75.00/96.00

for comparison of OCT-A whole image vessel density. for comparison of OCT-A inside disc vessel density. for comparison of OCT-A peripapillary vessel density. AUROC: area under receiver operating characteristic curve; SE: standard error; OCT-A: optical coherence tomography angiography; LSFG: laser speckle flowgraphy; MBR: mean blur rate; MBRA: mean MBR in all areas; MBRV: mean MBR in the vessel area; MBRT: mean MBR in the tissue area; GCC: ganglion cell complex; RNFL: retinal nerve fiber layer; Sn: sensitivity; Sp: specificities.