Research Article

Comparison of 532 nm Micropulse Green Laser versus Continuous-Wave 532 nm Green Laser in Chronic Central Serous Chorioretinopathy: Long-Term Follow-Up

Table 1

Descriptive statistics for selected ophthalmological parameters in the studied patients diagnosed as having chronic central serous chorioretinopathy and treated with Micropulse Laser Treatment (MLT) and conventional Continuous-wave Laser (CL).

Mean ± SD(Min-max)Mean ± SD(Min–max)Mean ± SD(Min-max)
Baseline1 month12 months

MLT()Visual acuity0.53 ± 0.166/19–6/7.50.84 ± 0.176/12–6/60.89 ± 0.136/9.5–6/6<0.001
(†)Central retinal thickness (μm)201.5 ± 33.8132–257175.7 ± 29.0108–228174.1 ± 27.3108–236<0.001
(‡)Photoreceptors length (μm)82.8 ± 18.856–13466.2 ± 15.140–11961.2 ± 12.640–106<0.001
()Subretinal fluid (μm)166.6 ± 96.421–43035.5 ± 27.00–12712.4 ± 27.70–126<0.001

CL()Visual acuity0.52 ± 0.206/30–6/7.50.69 ± 0.186/19–6/60.71 ± 0.176/19–6/6<0.001
(†)Central retinal thickness (μm)198.8 ± 57.564–337173.9 ± 47.965–260194.9 ± 54.865–260= 0.233
(‡)Photoreceptors length (μm)82.5 ± 23.126–12356.8 ± 18.420–9042.9 ± 8.920–55<0.001
()Subretinal fluid (μm)199.2 ± 87.937–31527.1 ± 30.30–11112.2 ± 30.10–111<0.001
Significance level() (†) (‡) ()