Research Article
The Difference in Repeatability of Automated Superficial Retinal Vessel Density according to the Measurement Area Using OCT Angiography
Table 2
Comparisons of the vascular density, perfusion density, and foveal avascular zone metrics between 3 × 3 mm and 6 × 6 mm scans.
| | Mean values of two 3 × 3 mm scans | Mean values of two 6 × 6 mm scans | value |
| Vessel density | | | | Total area (mean ± SD, mm−1) | 20.77 ± 1.80 | 18.53 ± 0.60 | | Center (mean ± SD, mm−1) | 10.53 ± 8.37 | 9.93 ± 6.53 | <0.001 | Inner average (mean ± SD, mm−1) | 22.06 ± 1.75 | 18.65 ± 0.92 | <0.001 | Perfusion density | | | | Total area (mean ± SD) | 0.359 ± 0.013 | 0.434 ± 0.015 | | Center (mean ± SD) | 0.171 ± 0.017 | 0.196 ± 0.028 | <0.001 | Inner average (mean ± SD) | 0.382 ± 0.013 | 0.422 ± 0.022 | <0.001 | Foveal avascular area | | | | Area (mean ± SD, mm2) | 0.245 ± 0.115 | 0.280 ± 0.120 | 0.484 | Perimeter (mean ± SD, mm) | 2.269 ± 0.564 | 2.176 ± 0.581 | 0.018 | Circularity (mean ± SD) | 0.652 ± 0.088 | 0.704 ± 0.098 | <0.001 |
|
|
SD, standard deviation. The p value was obtained using a paired t-test. Boldface numbers indicate statistically significant differences at . |