Pars Plana Vitrectomy versus Intravitreal Injection of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema Associated with Vitreomacular Interface Abnormalities
Table 2
Changes in visual acuity and OCT measurements during the study period.
Months
CDVA (LogMAR)
value
CSFT(µm)
value
Group I (n = 20)
Group II (n = 20)
Group I (n = 20)
Group II (n = 20)
Baseline
0.78 ± 0.29
0.83 ± 0.28
0.618
516 ± 93
527 ± 116
0.759
1st
0.63 ± 0.27
0.83 ± 0.27
0.027
446 ± 107
382 ± 77
0.036
2nd
0.59 ± 0.26
0.79 ± 0.24
0.017
404 ± 106
348 ± 83
0.068
3rd
0.60 ± 0.27
0.79 ± 0.26
0.032
381 ± 112
325 ± 88
0.090
4th
0.58 ± 0.28
0.78 ± 0.25
0.024
370 ± 105
321 ± 90
0.129
5th
0.57 ± 0.30
0.78 ± 0.27
0.030
384 ± 106
317 ± 93
0.038
6th
0.56 ± 0.29
0.74 ± 0.29
0.061
355 ± 105
311 ± 94
0.172
Fp value
<0.001
0.115
<0.001
<0.001
Group I: ranibizumab; Group II: pars plana vitrectomy; t: Student’s t-test; F: F test (ANOVA); CDVA: corrected distance visual acuity; CSFT: central subfield thickness. Statistically significant at .