Review Article

Accuracy of Deep Learning Algorithms for the Diagnosis of Retinopathy of Prematurity by Fundus Images: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Table 2

The results of primary and subgroup analyses.

Sensitivity (95% CI)Specificity (95% CI)PLR (95% CI)NLR (95% CI)DOR (95% CI)AUC (95% CI)Spearman r ( value)

Primary analyses0.953 (0.946–0.959)0.975 (0.973–0.977)19.265 (8.431–44.019)0.065 (0.040–0.105)313.73 (115.85–849.60)0.984 (0.978–0.989)−0.561 (0.030)
Validation dataset0.934 (0.922–0.945)0.973 (0.969–0.977)26.232 (6.978–98.616)0.076 (0.046–0.125)359.58 (94.565–1367.3)0.977 (0.968–0.986)−0.612 (0.060)
Test dataset0.969 (0.961–0.975)0.977 (0.974–0.979)22.853 (12.593–41.475)0.049 (0.026–0.092)522.92 (213.89–1278.4)0.987 (0.982–0.992)−0.280 (0.354)
Define ROP0.956 (0.949–0.962)0.979 (0.977–0.981)30.118 (19.225–47.184)0.055 (0.033–0.092)576.21 (238.54–1391.9)0.9895 (0.9849–0.9941)−0.503 (0.138)
Distinguish ROP0.931 (0.906–0.952)0.856 (0.826–0.882)7.927 (2.049–30.674)0.097 (0.038–0.252)88.655 (13.251–593.13)0.9820 (0.9641–0.9999)−0.600 (0.285)

Note. PLR, positive likelihood ratio; NLR, negative likelihood ratio; DOR, diagnostic odds ratios.