Author, year Final surgical outcome Presence of retinal displacement N (%) Amount and direction of retinal displacement Visual acuity Presence of visual symptoms OCT outcomes Final follow-up time Shiragami [3 ] All successful reattachment 27/43 (62.8%) Downward = 43 eyes Significant improvement in all patients No patients complained of cyclovertical diplopia or slant N/A 6 months 1–5° extorsion = 16 eyes 1–4° vertical deviation = 13 eyes Pandya [6 ] 1 failed reattachment 5/5 (100%) Downward = 5 eyes Significant improvement in all patients Vertical diplopia reported in 3/5 patients and 1/5 patients at 3-month follow-up Residual subfoveal fluid = 1/5 Mean follow-up: 5.8 months Inferior redetachment = 1/5 Brosh [7 ] All successful reattachment PPV = 55/124 (44.4%) Upward: Significant improvement in all patients Vertical: Interdigitation zone abnormalities on the 6 mm OCT: Median follow-up: 3 months PR = 8/114 (7%) PPV = 3 eyes With displacement: With displacement: PR = 6 eyes 25/30 (83.3%) 55/57 eyes (96.5%) Downward: Without displacement: Without displacement: PPV = 52 eyes 65/117 (55.6%) 135/162 patients (83.3%) eyes PR = 2 eyes Horizontal: Mean displacement With displacement: PPV = 0.297 mm 20/30 (66.7%) PR = 0.137 mm Without displacement: 62/117 (53%) Schawkat [8 ] All successful reattachment 17/50 (34%) Ranged between 1.0° and 7.5° Significant improvement in all patients 10/17 of patients with retinal displacement N/A 6 weeks Dell’Omo [10 ] All successful reattachment 40/125 (35.2%)† Upward = 5 eyes Significant improvement in all patients No patients complained of cyclovertical diplopia or slant. OCT sections of RVPs did not reveal characteristic features 12 months Downward = 39 eyes 18–58° extorsion = 28 eyes 18–38° intorsion = 3 eyes 18–48° vertical deviation = 13 eyes Codenotti [11 ] All successful reattachment 12/23 (52.2%)‡ Downward = 10 eyes Significant improvement in all patients 2/23 complained of vertical diplopia and vision distortion N/A 3 months Upward = 2 eyes Cobos [15 ] All successful reattachment 12/20 (60%) Downward = 12 eyes Significant improvement in all patients N/A OCT analysis showed no differences in retinal displacement cases 3 months Casswell [13 ] All successful reattachment 100/203 (49.26%) Face-down = 0.5° at 8 weeks, 0.3° at 6 months Significant improvement in all patients More diplopia reported in face-down patients (1.5%) compared to support-the-break (7.6%) N/A 6 months Support-the-break = 0.8° at 8 weeks, 0.9° at 6 months Dell’Omo [16 ] All successful reattachment 7/20 (35%) N/A Significant improvement in all patients N/A N/A 4 weeks Guber [9 ] All successful reattachment 17/50 (34%) Downward shift Significant improvement in all patients 10/17 with retinal shift reported distorted vision N/A 2 months Shift between 1.0° and 7.5° Lee [5 ] All successful reattachment PPV + gas: Displacement is typically heterogeneous N/A PPV + gas: PPV + gas: Median follow-up: 29 days Mac-off = 22/32 (72%) Magnitude of displacement associated with extent of retinal detachment in degrees of involvement above ( Mac-off = 22/32 (72%) Mac-off = 15/32 (47%) ORF (n = 6); SRF (n = 1); outer-retinal photoreceptor layer defects (n = 3); ERM (n = 1); full thickness macular fold (n = 1) or hole (n = 1) Mac-on = 5/17 (29%) Mac-on = 2/17 (12%)§ Mac-on = 4/17 (24%) PPV + SO : Mac-off = 2/2 (100%) ORF (n = 2); CME (n = 1); ERM (n = 1) Shiragami [12 ] All successful reattachment 38/86 (44.2%) Downward shift N/A Group 1 = 1/44 patients N/A 3 months 1–7° extorsion 1–9° vertical deviation Dell’Omo [4 ] All successful reattachment 4/33 (12.1%) N/A Significant improvement in all patients 22 (67%) complained of postoperative metamorphopsia ORF = 14 (42.4%) Median follow-up: 24 days IRF = 16 (48.8%) IS/OS skip reflectivity abnormalities = 8 (24.2%) Photoreceptor IS/OS band disruption at the fovea = 10 (30.3%) Casswell [14 ] All successful reattachment 61.4% of FC images N/A N/A N/A N/A 8 weeks 52.8% of cSLO images
