Research Article
Modified Epiblepharon Repair Preserving Orbicularis Oculi Muscle
Table 3
Correlation of postoperative cosmetic satisfaction with clinical characteristics and the preoperative severity of epiblepharon.
| Cosmesis score | Cosmetically satisfactory (n = 75) | Cosmetically unsatisfactory (n = 7) | value | Excellent cosmesis (≥9) (n = 53) | Nonexcellent cosmesis (n = 29) | value | ≥7 | <6 | ≥9 | ≤8 |
| Age | 6.9 ± 3.8 | 8.3 ± 2.9 | 0.268 | 7.2 ± 4.3 | 6.6 ± 2.6 | 0.455 |
| BMI | 17.9 ± 3.0 | 18.8 ± 4.2 | 0.584 | 17.5 ± 2.7 | 18.8 ± 3.7 | 0.124 |
| f/u | 5.2 ± 4.3 | 7.0 ± 2.6 | 0.122 | 5.4 ± 5.0 | 5.1 ± 2.4 | 0.638 |
| Grade of epiblepharon | Skin fold height | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 0.262 | 2.6 ± 1.0 | 3.1 ± 0.9 | 0.027 | Corneal touch | 2.2 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 0.8 | 0.849 | 2.3 ± 0.7 | 2.1 ± 0.8 | 0.266 | Severity score | 4.9 ± 1.4 | 5.4 ± 1.3 | 0.359 | 4.9 ± 1.3 | 5.2 ± 1.4 | 0.340 |
|
|
By independent t-test. Significantly associated parameter. |