Research Article
Ranking All DEA-Efficient DMUs Based on Cross Efficiency and Analytic Hierarchy Process Methods
Table 5
Example
1: pairwise comparison matrices of seven CCR-efficient DMUs.
| ā | DMU1 | DMU4 | DMU7 | DMU12 | DMU15 | DMU17 | DMU20 | Weight |
| DMU1 | 1 | 0.7646271 | 0.9123273 | 0.9171495 | 0.7644273 | 0.8967514 | 1.0232103 | 0.33493 | DMU4 | 1.3078269 | 1 | 1.0095312 | 1.0757141 | 0.9886519 | 1.3569705 | 1.1753435 | 0.42144 | DMU7 | 1.0960978 | 0.9905587 | 1 | 1.0601981 | 0.9638027 | 1.0423561 | 1.0526712 | 0.38601 | DMU12 | 1.0903347 | 0.9296149 | 0.9432199 | 1 | 0.9222442 | 0.9722520 | 1.0387729 | 0.36912 | DMU15 | 1.3081688 | 1.0114783 | 1.0375567 | 1.0843114 | 1 | 1.1905150 | 1.1539501 | 0.41546 | DMU17 | 1.115136 | 0.7369356 | 0.9593650 | 1.0285398 | 0.8399725 | 1 | 0.8408676 | 0.34737 | DMU20 | 0.9773161 | 0.8508150 | 0.9499641 | 0.9626742 | 0.8665885 | 1.1892478 | 1 | 0.36284 |
|
|