Research Article
New Mean and Median Techniques to Solve Multiobjective Linear Fractional Programming Problem and Comparison with Other Techniques
Table 6
The comparison of the five numerical results that are obtained from previous examples is presented as follows.
| | Techniques | Example 1 | Example 2 | Example 3 | Example 4 | Example 5 |
| | Chandra Sen | 1.96 | 17.853 | 1.11 | 1.217 | 0.716 | | Advanced transformation | — | 33.189 | 1.56 | 0.56 | — | | New arithmetic average | 11.048 | 22.126 | 8.658 | 7 | 4.29 | | New geometric average | — | 23.42 | 9.188 | 14.47 | — | | Advanced harmonic average | — | 12.458 | 9.75 | 29.014 | — | | Advanced mean deviation | 3499 | 44.2 | 15.6 | 29.014 | 4.53 | | Pearson 2 skewness coefficient | — | 12.458 | 2.418 | 14.98 | 1.29 | | New Mean and Median technique 1 | 505.05 | 188.769 | 37.144 | 124.43 | 25.79 | | New Mean and Median Technique 2 | 20968 | 188.769 | 22.386 | 151.35 | 8.058 |
|
|
