Research Article

Prevalence of Schistosoma mansoni Infection and Associated Risk Factors among School Children in Jiga Town, Northwest-Ethiopia: A Cross-Sectional Study

Table 3

Prevalence and odds ratios (OR) of S. mansoni infection by sociodemographic, environmental, and behavioral actors of school children in Jiga town and its surrounding rural “Kebeles” (2019).

Determinant factorS. mansoni valueCOR (95% CI) valueAOR (95%)
PositiveNegative

Age of participants
 7-1021 (20.2)@83 (79.8)0.0043.831 (1.554-9.446)0.2052.389 (0.621,9.19)
 11-1427 (18.6)118 (81.4)0.0053.465 (1.449, 8.284)0.0183.04 (1.12, 8.21)
 ≥157 (6.2)106 (93.8)11
Grade level
 1-435 (20.5)136 (79.5)0.0092.200 (1.215, 3.984)0.3711.849 (0.482, 7.10)
 5-820 (10.5)171 (89.5)11
School of participants
 Chifarit10 (30.3)23 (69.7)0.0033.836 (1.556, 9.398)0.6461.491 (0.272, 8.18)
 T/Wuha28 (17.3)134 (82.7)0.0631.844 (0.966, 3.518)0.5130.629 (0.150, 2.50)
 Jiga 0117 (10.2)150 (89.8)11
Knowledge about schistosomiasis
 Yes8 (9.3)78 (90.7)0.07910.6131
 No47 (17)229 (83)2.036 (0.922, 4.495)0.621 (0.149,2.43)
Sex of participants
 Male33 (15.1)186 (84.9)0.9351.025 (0.570, 1.840)
 Female22 (15.4)121 (84.6)1
Residence
 Jiga town21 (15.1)118 (84.9)1
 Rural villages34 (15.2)189 (84.8)0.9710.989 (0.548, 1.786)
Parents occupation
 Farmer32 (19.1)136 (80.9)0.1571.882 (0.785, 4.516)
 Merchants16 (12.2)115 (87.8)0.8241.113 (0.433, 2.860)
 Gov’t employee7 (11.1)56 (88.6)1
River water contact
 No2 (28.6)@5 (71.4)11
 Yes53 (14.9)302 (85.1)0.0087.948 (1.728, 36.559)0.0514.86 (0.991, 23.8)
Shoes wearing habit
 Sometimes21 (24.7)64 (75.3)<0.0015.344 (2.154, 13.256)0.0016.06 (2.6, 14.13)
 Usually27 (17.3)129 (82.7)0.0063.409 (1.403, 8.125)
 Regularly7 (5.8)114 (94.2)11
Proper latrine usage
 No27 (16.6)136 (83.4)0.5111.121 (0.683, 2.154)
 Yes28 (14.1)171 (85.9)1
Swimming in river water
 No13 (8.7)136 (91.3)11
 Yes42 (19.7)171 (80.3)0.0050.389 (0.201, 0.754)0.997
Crossing a river with barefoot
 No21 (14.4)125 (85.6)1
 Yes34 (15.7)182 (84.3)0.7240.899 (0.499, 1.622)
Drinking water source
 Tap27 (12.1)196 (87.9)11
 River/well28 (20.1)111 (79.9)0.0401.831 (1.028, 3.263)0.998

Note: @No (%), statistically significant at .