Research Article
Performance of Synthetic Double Sampling Chart with Estimated Parameters Based on Expected Average Run Length
Table 1
Optimal charting parameters
and the corresponding
for
with different combinations of
when
.
| | | | | | | | | | | 30 | 50 | 80 | 200 | 500 | |
| 3 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 2 | 6 | 1.3830 | 5.2804 | 2.0239 | 9 | 3.56 | 3.36 | 3.26 | 3.18 | 3.15 | 3.13 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 2 | 2 | 0.6745 | 4.8576 | 2.0503 | 2 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.02 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 1.01 | 4 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3 | 6 | 1.3830 | 5.2804 | 2.0539 | 7 | 2.60 | 2.51 | 2.46 | 2.42 | 2.40 | 2.40 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 3 | 3 | 0.9674 | 4.9920 | 2.0086 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 5 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 3 | 8 | 1.1503 | 5.0443 | 2.0618 | 6 | 2.05 | 2.00 | 1.98 | 1.96 | 1.96 | 1.95 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 4 | 3 | 0.9674 | 4.9920 | 2.0363 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 6 | 0.2 | 1.0 | 4 | 9 | 1.2206 | 5.1630 | 2.0210 | 5 | 1.73 | 1.71 | 1.69 | 1.68 | 1.68 | 1.67 | 1.0 | 2.0 | 5 | 3 | 0.9674 | 4.9920 | 2.0527 | 2 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 1.00 |
|
|