Research Article

Evaluation of Four Multiple Imputation Methods for Handling Missing Binary Outcome Data in the Presence of an Interaction between a Dummy and a Continuous Variable

Table 1

Comparison of the performance of imputation methods based on the average raw bias (RB) of regression coefficients over 1000 simulations.

VariableMethodMARMCAR
10%20%30%40%50%10%20%30%40%50%

(BMIreal)MCR0.0240.0500.0820.1190.1450.0280.0540.0830.1120.157
MI0.0010.0060.0120.0160.0200.0020.0080.0120.0000.020
MRF−0.013−0.024−0.028−0.038−0.052−0.009−0.017−0.026−0.040−0.040
MS−0.071−0.123−0.177−0.228−0.278−0.069−0.129−0.178−0.236−0.276
(Betotal)MCR−0.010−0.021−0.034−0.050−0.058−0.011−0.023−0.032−0.044−0.066
MI0.0010.0010.0040.0000.0090.0000.0000.0040.0080.003
MRF−0.034−0.064−0.092−0.124−0.142−0.031−0.062−0.087−0.112−0.139
MS−0.087−0.156−0.213−0.266−0.308−0.086−0.157−0.218−0.267−0.314
(PACS4)MCR−0.023−0.036−0.052−0.073−0.086−0.010−0.016−0.030−0.041−0.053
MI−0.0030.0040.0060.0080.0110.0010.0050.0050.0080.008
MRF−0.054−0.091−0.129−0.167−0.196−0.034−0.066−0.098−0.123−0.151
MS−0.118−0.184−0.236−0.278−0.311−0.086−0.156−0.217−0.264−0.312
(PSPS)MCR−0.020−0.036−0.055−0.071−0.095−0.008−0.022−0.034−0.046−0.063
MI0.000−0.0010.002−0.0010.0000.0030.0020.0020.0050.004
MRF−0.052−0.094−0.129−0.167−0.200−0.032−0.066−0.097−0.126−0.156
MS−0.113−0.187−0.237−0.280−0.314−0.087−0.158−0.218−0.271−0.315
(Gender)MCR0.000−0.005−0.022−0.033−0.035−0.012−0.025−0.040−0.062−0.068
MI0.0040.0070.0030.0030.018−0.0010.004−0.006−0.0020.003
MRF−0.015−0.027−0.054−0.071−0.080−0.024−0.043−0.068−0.086−0.102
MS−0.043−0.070−0.097−0.121−0.132−0.051−0.084−0.115−0.141−0.162
(BMIreal ∗ Gender)MCR−0.076−0.144−0.228−0.304−0.390−0.072−0.136−0.225−0.300−0.401
MI−0.0020.000−0.0100.006−0.0030.0020.0010.0000.003−0.004
MRF−0.128−0.233−0.345−0.431−0.517−0.119−0.231−0.327−0.417−0.514
MS−0.236−0.405−0.533−0.628−0.716−0.231−0.399−0.534−0.631−0.722