Research Article
A Two-Stage Optimization Strategy for Fuzzy Object-Based Analysis Using Airborne LiDAR and High-Resolution Orthophotos for Urban Road Extraction
Table 6
Classification assessment (confusion matrix, per class accuracies, and total accuracies) on the test site.
| | User class/sample | Tree | Road | Building | Grass | Bare | Shadow | Sum |
| | Confusion matrix |
| | Tree | 58 | 0 | 1 | 7 | 0 | 18 | 84 | | Road | 3 | 54 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 3 | 63 | | Building | 2 | 6 | 116 | 15 | 4 | 22 | 165 | | Grass | 2 | 1 | 1 | 53 | 0 | 2 | 59 | | Bare | 5 | 10 | 5 | 3 | 57 | 3 | 83 | | Shadow | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 37 | 38 | | Sum | 70 | 71 | 124 | 79 | 63 | 85 | |
| | Accuracy |
| | Producer | 0.82 | 0.76 | 0.93 | 0.67 | 0.90 | 0.43 | | | User | 0.69 | 0.85 | 0.70 | 0.89 | 0.68 | 0.97 | | | KIA per class | 0.79 | 0.72 | 0.90 | 0.62 | 0.88 | 0.38 | |
| | Overall accuracy (%) | | 76 | | Kappa index of agreement (KIA) | | 0.70 |
|
|