Research Article
A GTCC-Based Underwater HMM Target Classifier with Fading Channel Compensation
Table 3
Classifiers performance comparison.
| Performance conditions | Prototype HMM classifier (%) | Success rates (%) | Artificial neural network classifier | Euclidean distance classifier |
| Without ambient noise | 93 | 89 | 86 | Signals obscured by self-noise | Without spectral subtraction and HMM trained without self-noise signals | 47 | 41 | 38 | Without spectral subtraction and HMM trained with self-noise-affected signal | 74 | 67 | 63 | With spectral subtraction and HMM trained with non-self-noise signals | 85 | 79 | 68 | Signals obscured by Rayleigh fading | Without Rayleigh fading compensation and HMM trained with nonfaded signals | 49 | 44 | 38 | Without Rayleigh fading compensation and HMM trained with faded signals | 83 | 78 | 75 | With Rayleigh fading compensation applied | Autoregressive model with linear interpolation | 89 | 84 | 81 |
|
|