Research Article
Radar Working State Recognition Based on the Unsupervised and Incremental Method
Table 10
Experimental results of algorithm comparison.
| Data set | Algorithm | Purity | RI | -measure | Time (s) | Known | Unknown | Known | Unknown | Known | Unknown | Known | Unknown |
| A | IAP | 0.821 | 0.863 | 0.847 | 0.760 | 0.594 | 0.926 | 33.18 | 26.10 | AP | 0.733 | 0.797 | 0.800 | 0.725 | 0.538 | 0.798 | 51.64 | 48.11 | -means | 0.633 | 0.65 | 0.834 | 0.803 | 0.556 | 0.757 | 0.12 | 0.12 |
| B | IAP | 0.754 | 0.713 | 0.800 | 0.535 | 0.433 | 0.832 | 26.98 | 11.47 | AP | 0.649 | 0.638 | 0.778 | 0.501 | 0.412 | 0.624 | 46.94 | 25.12 | -means | 0.473 | 0.516 | 0.680 | 0.675 | 0.551 | 0.542 | 0.13 | 0.12 |
| APAR | IAP | 0.919 | 0.813 | 0.951 | 0.669 | 0.846 | 0.897 | 66.56 | 42.80 | AP | 0.845 | 0.773 | 0.917 | 0.711 | 0.775 | 0.872 | 102.07 | 63.31 | -means | 0.740 | 0.690 | 0.870 | 0.862 | 0.756 | 0.737 | 0.15 | 0.14 |
|
|