Research Article
A Robust and Lightweight Detector for Ship Target with Complex Background in SAR Image
Table 8
Comparison of performance indexes of different pruning rates after Varifocal-EIoU fine-tuning.
| Model | SSDD | HRSID | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | AP (%) | (%) | Precision (%) | Recall (%) | AP (%) | (%) |
| 0.1 prune | 97.9 | 97.0 | 99.0 | 97.4 | 93.9 | 90.1 | 95.0 | 92.0 | 0.2 prune | 97.7 | 97.0 | 98.8 | 97.3 | 93.3 | 88.9 | 94.6 | 91.0 | 0.3 prune | 95.4 | 94.7 | 98.7 | 95.0 | 93.0 | 88.9 | 94.3 | 91.0 | 0.4 prune | 95.3 | 94.7 | 98.4 | 95.0 | 93.3 | 86.6 | 93.8 | 89.8 | 0.5 prune | 95.9 | 94.1 | 97.9 | 95.0 | 92.9 | 86.4 | 93.3 | 89.5 | 0.6 prune | 95.5 | 92.8 | 97.6 | 94.1 | 92.3 | 86.4 | 92.9 | 89.3 | 0.7 prune | 93.6 | 93.8 | 97.5 | 93.7 | 92.1 | 85.1 | 92.4 | 88.5 | 0.8 prune | 94.7 | 92.0 | 97.1 | 93.3 | 89.0 | 82.7 | 89.3 | 85.7 | 0.9 prune | 93.3 | 87.7 | 95.5 | 90.4 | 89.4 | 76.0 | 85.1 | 82.2 |
|
|