Research Article

[Retracted] Evaluation and Analysis of Assisted Instruction and Ability Improvement Based on Artificial Intelligence

Table 11

Summary of teaching ability results of teachers of different genders.

Sig. valueDegree of freedomSignificance (bilateral)Mean difference

Subscale 1: teaching cognition abilityAssuming methods are equal1.0670.3031.1622440.2470.4027
Assuming methods are not equal1.155168.3030.250.4027
Subscale 2: instructional design abilityAssuming methods are equal0.7760.379-0.6032440.547-0.3422
Assuming methods are not equal-0.594163.4040.554-0.3422
Method designAssuming methods are equal7.7950.006-1.8562440.065-0.3145
Assuming methods are not equal-1.688132.3240.094-0.3145
Subscale 3: teaching implementation abilityAssuming methods are equal2.370.125-1.222440.224-0.56719
Assuming methods are not equal-1.172153.1960.243-0.56719
Classroom regulationAssuming methods are equal5.1710.024-1.9792440.049-0.39065
Assuming methods are not equal-1.847141.5760.067-0.39065
Subscale 4: teaching reflection abilityAssuming methods are equal8.4810.004-3.0362440.003-0.8437
Assuming methods are not equal-2.818139.5190.006-0.8437
Self-reflectionAssuming methods are equal9.9440.002-2.3892440.018-0.32386
Assuming methods are not equal-2.231141.830.027-0.32386
Reflection on teaching activitiesAssuming methods are equal7.2230.008-2.942440.004-0.51984
Assuming methods are not equal-2.779146.3550.006-0.51984
Subscale 5: teaching research abilityAssuming methods are equal2.4850.116-1.0722440.285-0.47965
Assuming methods are not equal-1.026151.8270.306-0.47965
Theoretical researchAssuming methods are equal5.5320.019-0.5672440.571-0.15097
Assuming methods are not equal-0.544152.7240.587-0.15097
Total amount tableAssuming methods are equal2.1840.141-1.0952440.275-1.83003
Assuming methods are not equal-1.063157.4280.29-1.83003