Design and Development of Biosensors for Progesterone Detection

Table 2

Performance comparison of progesterone biosensor with composite material.

Type of biosensor	Functional material	Samples	Linear rage (μmol/L)	LOD (nM)	References
Electrochemical biosensors based on carbonaceous nanomaterials and metal nanomaterials
Electrochemical biosensors based on aptamer	GQDs-NiO-AuNFs/f-MWCNTs	Human serum samples and drug formulations	0.00001-1	0.00186	[39]
	Au-CuO-Cu2O	Human serum	0.0005-0.180	0.17	[27]
Electrochemical biosensors based on nonenzymatic	WO3NBs@GR	Blood	0.025-1792.5	4.28	[26]
Electrochemical sensor based on carbonaceous nanomaterial and polymer modification
Electrochemical sensor	GQDs-PSSA	Human serum	0.001-6.0	0.31	[41]
Electrochemical sensors based on composite modification of biomaterials with carbon nanomaterials, metal nanomaterials, or polymers
Electrochemical biosensors based on immune	Thi-GO	Milk	0.00006369-0.06369	—	[28]
Electrochemical biosensors based on nonenzymatic	GO-IMZ	Drug samples	0.22-14.0	64	[30]
Electrochemical biosensors based on enzyme	CYP3A4/PNGFs	Laboratory control standard	—	—	[31]
Surface plasmon resonance imaging optical biosensor	Thionine-graphene oxide (Thi-GO) and biotin-avidin system (BAS)	—	—	—	[52]
Optical biosensor based on composite material modification
Light-emitting resonance energy transfer (LRET) optical signal sensor	NaYF4@NaYF4:Yb, tm@NaYF4	Human serum	—	0.004331	[44]
Optical biosensor (quantum dot Forster resonance energy transfer (FRET) method)	QD-TF-FRET	Artificial urine	—	—	[45]
Fluorescent biosensor	Photonic crystal (PC) and UCNPs	Serum	—	—	[43]
Others
Electrochemical biosensors based on nonimmune	GCE/AuNPs	Milk	35-800	11.4	[37]
Electrochemical biosensors based on immune	MGO	Progesterone standard sample	0.00000001-1	DPV: 0.00015; CV: 0.00017	[4]

Note that LOD represents the limit of detection.