Review Article
Effectiveness of Sun Protection Interventions Delivered to Adolescents in a Secondary School Setting: A Systematic Review
Table 1
Quality assessment components and ratings for EPHPP instrument.
| Components | Strong | Moderate | Weak |
| Selection bias | Very likely to be representative of the target population and greater than 80% participation rate | Somewhat likely to be representative of the target population and 60–79% participation rate | All other responses or not stated | Design | RCT and CCT | Cohort analytic, case-control, cohort, or an interrupted time series | All other designs or design not stated | Confounders | Controlled for at least 80% of confounders | Controlled for 60–79% of confounders | Confounders not controlled for, or not stated | Blinding | Blinding of outcome assessor and study participants to intervention status and/or research question | Blinding of either outcome assessor or study participants | Outcome assessor and study participants are aware of intervention status and/or research question | Data collection | Tools are valid and reliable | Tools are valid but reliability not described | No evidence of validity or reliability | Withdrawals/dropouts | Follow-up rate of >80% of participants | Follow-up rate of 60–79% of participants | Follow-up rate of <60% of participants or withdrawals and dropouts not described |
|
|
Reproduced with permission [ 11]. |