Research Article

Attractive Sugar Bait Formulation for Development of Attractive Toxic Sugar Bait for Control of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus)

Table 1

Number of mosquitoes (laboratory strains and field strains) attracted towards different juice-sugar mixtures (ASBs) in prescreening cage bioassays.

S. No.ASBLaboratory strainsField strains
AND-Aedes aegyptiAND-Aedes aegypti-DL10Aedes aegypti (SHD-Delhi)Aedes aegypti (GVD-Delhi)
No. of mosquitoes landed on the bait ± SEMControlNo. of mosquitoes landed on the bait ± SEMControlNo. of mosquitoes landed on the bait ± SEMControlNo. of mosquitoes landed on the bait ± SEMControl

1.Water melon5 ± 0.408 a7.75 ± 0.629#11.5 ± 1.190 a12.5 ± 0.55.25 ± 0.629 a8 ± 0.816#5.5 ± 0.288 a8 ± 0.707#

2.Musk melon5.25 ± 0.250 a9.75 ± 0.853#13 ± 0.816 a14.25 ± 0.478#6.25 ± 0.478 ab10 ± 0.816#6.25 ± 0.478 a9.5 ± 0.288#

3.Orange5.75 ± 0.629 a9.75 ± 0.478#5.25 ± 0.25 b10.25 ± 0.629#11.25 ± 0.478 c12 ± 0.4084.75 ± 0.478 a9.75 ± 0.478#

4.Sweet lemon7.25 ± 0.478 a9.25 ± 0.478#7.25 ± 0.478 c10 ± 0.707#11.25 ± 0.629 c8.5 ± 0.645#5.75 ± 0.478 a10 ± 0.408#

5.Papaya4.5 ± 0.500 a11.75 ± 0.62911 ± 0.408 a11.5 ± 0.5008.25 ± 0.478 b13.25 ± 0.750#5.75 ± 0.750 a11.5 ± 0.288#

6.Mango10 ± 0.577 b8.5 ± 0.500#17.25 ± 0.853 d9.75 ± 0.629#12 ± 0.577 c8.5 ± 0.645#11.5 ± 0.645 b8.5 ± 0.500#

7.Plum20.5 ± 0.645 c10.5 ± 0.288#18.75 ± 0.478 d10.5 ± 0.500#18 ± 0.408 d10.25 ± 0.478#19.75 ± 0.750 c11 ± 0.408#

8.Pineapple5 ± 0.408 a11 ± 0.816#5.75 ± 0.629 b11 ± 0.816#6.75 ± 0.250 ab11 ± 0.707#6.75 ± 0.250 a12 ± 0.408#

9.Guava18.5 ± 1.32 c10.25 ± 0.629#19.5 ± 0.645 d10.5 ± 0.288#17.5 ± 0.645 d9.5 ± 0.288#18.75 ± 0.478 c10.75 ± 0.750#

Four replicates each with n = 50, 25 males and 25 females (1 h @ intervals of 10 min), with total n = 200. Values in the table represent number of mosquito landings; ASBs with different letters (column-wise) and different symbols (row-wise) are significantly different () computed by one-way ANOVA, followed by Tukey’s all pairwise multiple comparison test.