Research Article
Treatment Adherence among HIV and TB Patients Using Single and Double Way Mobile Phone Text Messages: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Table 7
Adherence to ART between the single-way and double-way SMS and control of the groups before and after 6 months of intervention.
| Assessment | Group | Level of adherence | Effect estimate | Poor No (%) | Good No (%) | RR (95% CI) | -value |
| Baseline | Control | 49 (70.0) | 21 (30.0) | 1.00 (0.81-1.24) | 1.000 | Single-way SMS | 49 (70.0) | 21 (30.0) | | | Control | 49 (70.0) | 21 (30.0) | 1.04 (0.83-1.31) | 0.716 | Double-way SMS | 47 (67.1) | 23 (32.9) | | |
| After 6 Months intervention | Control | 29 (54.7) | 24 (45.3) | 0.99 (0.71–1.39) | 0.962 | Single-way SMS | 32 (55.2) | 26 (44.8) | | | Control | 29 (54.7) | 24 (45.3) | 1.06 (0.75–1.50) | 0.746 | Double-way SMS | 31 (51.7) | 29 (48.3) | | |
|
|
RR = risk ratio; CI = confidence interval; SMS: short message service.
|