Research Article
Treatment Adherence among HIV and TB Patients Using Single and Double Way Mobile Phone Text Messages: A Randomized Controlled Trial
Table 8
Adherence to TB treatment between the single-way and double-way SMS and control of the groups before and after 3 months of intervention.
| Assessment | Group | Level of adherence | Effect estimate | Poor No (%) | Good No (%) | RR (95% CI) | -value |
| Baseline | Control | 20 (71.4) | 8 (28.6) | 1.43 (0.92–2.21) | 0.101 | Single-way SMS | 14 (50.0) | 14 (50.0) | | | Control | 20 (71.4) | 8 (28.6) | 1.33 (0.88–2.02) | 0.168 | Double-way SMS | 15 (53.6) | 13 (46.4) | | |
| After 3 months intervention | Control | 4 (20.0) | 16 (80.0) | 0.46 (0.17–1.24) | 0.101 | Single-way SMS | 10 (43.5) | 13 (56.3) | | | Control | 4 (20.0) | 16 (80.0) | 0.40 (0.15–1.05) | 0.039 | Double-way SMS | 12 (50.0) | 12 (50.0) | | |
|
|
RR = risk ratio; CI = Confidence Interval; SMS: short message service.
|