Characterization of Energetic Protons Generated in the ShenGuang-II UP Petawatt Laser Interactions with Foil Targets

Liu, Huiya; Lei, Anle; Kang, Ning; An, Honghai; Xie, Zhiyong; Zhao, Yao; Zhou, Shenlei; Sun, Mingying; Zhu, Baoqiang; Wang, Wei; Zhu, Jianqiang

doi:https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7205383

Laser and Particle Beams

On this page

Abstract Introduction Experimental Results and Analysis Conclusions Data Availability Conflicts of Interest Acknowledgments References Copyright Related Articles

Research Article | Open Access

Volume 2021 | Article ID 7205383 | https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/7205383

Characterization of Energetic Protons Generated in the ShenGuang-II UP Petawatt Laser Interactions with Foil Targets

Huiya Liu,¹Anle Lei,^1,2,3Ning Kang,¹Honghai An,²Zhiyong Xie,²Yao Zhao,¹Shenlei Zhou,¹Mingying Sun,¹Baoqiang Zhu,¹Wei Wang,²and Jianqiang Zhu¹

Academic Editor: Yuji Fukuda

Received14 May 2021

Accepted02 Aug 2021

Published18 Aug 2021

Abstract

The characterization of energetic protons generated in the ShenGuang-II UP petawatt laser interactions with foil targets has been systematically studied. The proton energy spectra and angular distributions are measured with a radiochromic film stack. It shows that the proton energy spectra have a Boltzmann distribution with temperature of about 2.8 MeV and cutoff energy of about 20 MeV. The divergence angles of protons vary from 10° to 60°, dependent on the proton energy. The proton source size and location are investigated via the proton point-projection mesh imaging. The proton virtual sources are found to locate tens to hundreds of microns in front of the foil target, depending on the proton energies. A Monte Carlo simulation estimates the diameter of the virtual proton source to be about 12 μm for the protons with energy of 16.8 MeV, which is much smaller than the laser focus size of about 50 μm. The spatial resolution of the 16.8 MeV proton imaging is quantified with the point spread function to be about 15 μm, which is consistent with the proton virtual source size. These results will be important for the users conducting experiments with the protons as a backlighting source on the ShenGuang-II UP petawatt laser.

1. Introduction

The energetic protons generated in short, intense laser interactions with foil targets have received much attention in recent years and have been widely studied both experimentally and theoretically [1–5]. The protons accelerated by the electric field at the rear side of the target via the target normal sheath acceleration (TNSA) mechanism have properties including short pulse duration and high brightness [6]. The protons have many potential applications, such as probing the fast dynamics of electric or magnetic fields in the laser produced plasmas [7–10], as a fast ignitor beam for laser-driven fusion [11], proton radiobiology [12–16], material science [17], and neutron production [18]. The characteristics of the laser-driven protons such as energy spectrum, divergence angle, and source size are essential for these applications.

The energetic protons accelerated through TNSA are from the water or hydrocarbon contaminant layers on the target rear surface and can be accelerated to tens of MeV. Usually, in the point-projection imaging experiments, the size of the source decides the best resolution [19]. However, the transverse size of the proton source was measured to be much larger than the imaging resolution [20]. It was, therefore, considered that the protons were emitted in a quasilaminar fashion from a virtual source with a small size [11, 21].

ShenGuang-II UP laser facility at the National Laboratory on High-Power Laser and Physics is a multifunctional experimental platform, which includes eight kilojoule-class nanosecond laser beams and one picosecond petawatt laser beam (called the SG-II UP petawatt laser, i.e., the SG-II UP PW laser) [22]. The SG-II UP PW laser is usually used for fast heating of an imploded dense core plasma or generating energetic protons as a backlight source to investigate the plasmas produced by the nanosecond lasers. In this article, the characterization of energetic protons generated in the SG-II UP PW laser interactions with foil targets was systematically presented. The proton point-projection imaging with Cu meshes in combination with a radiochromic film (RCF) stack was used to characterize the protons. The proton energy spectra, angular distribution, and the virtual source size and location were obtained. The spatial resolution of the proton imaging was also analysed and compared to the virtual source size. These results and findings will be important for the potential users to know the laser status and to understand the properties of the protons so as to design their experiments.

2. Experimental Setup

The experiment was conducted on the SG-II UP PW laser. The laser uses a hybrid technology combining optical parametric chirped-pulse amplifier and Nd:glass chirped-pulse amplifier to generate short pulse (1–10 ps) and large energy (up to 1000 J) at 1053 nm [22]. The experimental setup is shown in Figure 1. The laser was focused with an f/2.5 off-axis parabolic mirror to the 10 μm thickness Au foil targets, at an incidence angle of 21°. In some shots, a Cu mesh was put behind the foil target at a distance mm, as the object in the proton point-projection imaging to judge the quality of the proton imaging. The meshes (AG 200, Gilder Grids) were formed by 36 μm lines with 90 μm spacing. The protons emitting from the rear surface of the target passed through the mesh and were detected with RCF (HD-V2, GafChromic) stacks [23]. The front surface of the RCF stack was located mm behind the Cu mesh.

An X-ray pinhole camera (XPHC) with the theoretical resolution of about 13 μm was used to monitor the laser focus spot [24, 25]. An imaging plate (BAS-SR, Fuji Film) was used as the X-ray detector. In the experiment, the incident laser energy and pulse duration were set at 130 J and 1 ps, respectively, which represents a routine status of the laser as a proton backlighter. Figure 2(a) shows a typical XPHC image of the laser focus. Because a lot of physical processes are involved in the X-ray emission, such as fast electron reflux, recirculation, and transport inside the target (collision, Ohmic heating, etc.), scientifically scaling the measured emitted X-ray profile with the real laser focus intensity on the target is difficult. In this article, we assume that the X-ray intensity obtained by XPHC scales linearly with the laser intensity. The cumulative laser energy fraction as functions of intensity and focus diameter can be obtained, as shown in Figure 2(b). It shows that about 50% of the laser energy is contained within a 60 μm diameter, resulting in laser intensity over 1.5 × 10¹⁸ W/cm². The experimental results measured in each shot are shown in Figure 2(c), and the shot number 1 is chosen as a typical shot. The incident laser energies are stable at 130 J ± 15%, and the proton cutoff energies measured with the RCF stacks are all higher than 15 MeV.

(a)

(b)

(c)

3. Experimental Results and Analysis

3.1. Proton Energy Spectra and Angular Distribution

The generated protons pass through the RCF layers, depositing their kinetic energy in the RCFs [26]. Typical proton images recorded on the RCFs scanned by using the EPSON V750 scanner for the same shot as in Figure 2(a) are shown in Figure 3(a). It is obvious that the lower-energy protons have higher intensity and larger angular divergence angle. The maximum proton energy reaches up to 18.9 MeV.

(a)

(b)

(c)

The energy spectrum of the protons can be obtained from the RCF images. Based on the calibration of the HD-V2-type RCF for protons with different doses in [23, 26, 27], the optical density of the RCFs can be converted into the deposited proton energy. The spatially integrated proton number on each RCF layer can, thus, be obtained from the deposited energy with SRIM simulations and the spectrum unfolding calculation [28, 29], as shown in Figure 3(b). The proton energy spectrum shows an exponential profile. We fit the spectrum with the Boltzmann distribution. The fitted energy spectrum is shown in Figure 3(b), with total proton number and the temperature of about 1.2 × 10¹² and 2.8 MeV, respectively. As we can see from the Figure 3(b), because of the saturation of the lowest-energy RCF layers, the measured proton numbers at low proton energies are less than the fitted result. Based on the fitting result, the conversion efficiency of laser energy to the proton beam can be calculated to be about 0.62%.

With the given distances between the target and the RCF layers and sizes of the proton images, the divergence angles (referring the full beam aperture in this article) of the energy-resolved protons can be calculated, as shown in Figure 3(c). The results from VULCAN and 100TW-LULI lasers by Nürnberg et al. [26] are also shown for comparison. In Figure 3(c), the proton energy E is scaled to the maximum proton energy E_max, here MeV, 29.7 MeV, and 16.2 MeV for the SG-II UP PW, VULCAN, and 100TW-LULI lasers, respectively. The divergence angles of protons in our experiment are from 10° to 60°, dependent on the proton energy, with the divergence angle decreasing with the increase in the proton energy. The divergence angles of energy-resolved protons generated by the SG-II UP PW laser and VULCAN laser are similar but relatively differ from the 100TW-LULI laser. Note that the laser energy for the SG-II UP PW and VULCAN shot is about 130 J and that for the 100TW-LULI shot is about 15 J. That may be the reason why their divergences of protons are different.

3.2. Proton Source Location and Size

It has been shown that the laser-driven protons are emitted from a virtual source in a quasilaminar fashion [20]. The location of the virtual source can be obtained through calculating the magnification rate M of the Cu mesh in the proton image. The magnification rate M of the point-projection imaging in our experiment is the ratio of the virtual source-to-RCF layer distance to the virtual source-to-mesh distance.where ν is the distance from the virtual source to the foil target and is the distance from the front surface of the RCF stack to a RCF layer with specific proton energy. In the experiment, the magnification rate M can be measured as , where is the period of the mesh in the proton image and is the real period of the mesh. For the image of protons with energy of 16.8 MeV shown in Figure 3(a), mm, mm, mm, mm, and mm, we can then obtain mm. Using the same method, the positions of the virtual sources for protons with different energies in front of the target are obtained with the uncertainty of about 7%–15%, as listed in Table 1.

To estimate the size of the virtual source, a series of Monte Carlo simulations based on Geant4 were carried out for the protons with various source sizes [11, 30]. In the simulations, spatial Gaussian density distribution in the proton source was used.where and r are the total proton number and the 1/e is the radius of the proton source, respectively. The spatially resolved optical density distribution in the RCF layer is calculated, as shown in Figure 4. By comparing the experimental optical density profile with the simulated ones, we find that the protons with a virtual source size of about 12 μm in 1/e diameter can well match the experimental optical density profile.

(a)

(b)

3.3. Spatial Resolution of the Proton Imaging

The spatial resolution of the proton imaging reflects the size of the proton virtual source. We, therefore, analysed the mesh images on RCFs to obtain the point spread function (PSF) so as to quantify the proton imaging spatial resolution. We first fitted the edge of the experimental optical density profile in Figure 4(b) for X from 11 mm to 14 mm with an edge spread function (ESF) [31], which iswhereand I₀, σ, a₀, and a₁ are fitting coefficients. The fitted ESF is shown in Figure 5(a), which gives μm. Considering that the ESF is the integral response function of a Gaussian-type PSF, the PSF can be obtained as

(a)

(b)

So the full width at 1/e maximum of spatial resolution of proton imaging is μm. This is consistent with the size of the proton virtual source of about 12 μm obtained through Monte Carlo simulations. The energy-resolved 2σ of ESF values are listed in Table 1 and are compared with the virtual source sizes from VULCAN and 100TW-LULI lasers by Nürnberg et al. [26].

In addition, the normalized Fourier transform of the PSF represents the modulation transfer function (MTF), which iswhere and is the period of the modulation. Figure 5(b) shows the MTF for the protons with different energies. One sees that the spatial resolution of the 16.8 MeV proton imaging at 20% MTF is about 15 μm and that for other protons ranges from 12 to 25 μm.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the characteristics of the energetic protons accelerated from the SG-II UP PW laser interactions with foil targets were investigated. The maximum proton energy obtained in the experiment was 18.9 MeV with a laser pulse of 130 J and 1 ps. The energy spectrum of protons measured by the RCF stack is fitted with the Boltzmann distribution with the temperature of about 2.8 MeV. The emission of the protons showed a decreasing divergence angle from 60° to 10° with the increase in the proton energy. Based on the proton point-projection mesh imaging, the proton virtual sources for protons with different energies were found to locate tens to hundreds of microns in front of the target, and the size was estimated with a Monte Carlo simulation, to be about 12 μm in 1/e diameter for the protons with energy of 16.8 MeV. This size is consistent with the proton imaging spatial resolution of about 15 μm obtained from the point spread function. These results are of importance for experiments using the protons as a backlighting source on the SG-II UP PW laser.

Data Availability

Data can be made available upon request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the support from the technical team of the ShenGuang-II laser facility. This work was supported by the National Science and Technology Innovation Foundation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. CXJJ-20S015) and the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant No. XDA 25020204).

References

E. L. Clark, K. Krushelnick, J. R. Davies et al., “Measurements of energetic proton transport through magnetized plasma from intense laser interactions with solids,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 84, no. 4, pp. 670–673, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
R. A. Snavely, M. H. Key, S. P. Hatchett et al., “Intense high-energy proton beams from Petawatt-laser irradiation of solids,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, no. 14, pp. 2945–2948, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. P. Hatchett, C. G. Brown, T. E. Cowan et al., “Electron, photon, and ion beams from the relativistic interaction of Petawatt laser pulses with solid targets,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 7, no. 5, pp. 2076–2082, 2000.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Pukhov, “Three-dimensional simulations of ion acceleration from a foil irradiated by a short-pulse laser,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 16, pp. 3562–3565, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Daido, M. Nishiuchi, and A. S. Pirozhkov, “Review of laser-driven ion sources and their applications,” Reports on Progress in Physics, vol. 7, Article ID 056401, 2012.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. C. Wilks, A. B. Langdon, T. E. Cowan et al., “Energetic proton generation in ultra-intense laser-solid interactions,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 542–549, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. A. Cecchetti, M. Borghesi, J. Fuchs et al., “Magnetic field measurements in laser-produced plasmas via proton deflectometry,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 16, Article ID 043102, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Chien, L. Gao, H. Ji et al., “Study of a magnetically driven reconnection platform using ultrafast proton radiography,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 26, Article ID 062113, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H. Ahmed, S. Kar, G. Cantono et al., “Investigations of ultrafast charge dynamics in laser-irradiated targets by a self probing technique employing laser driven protons,” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment, vol. 829, pp. 172–175, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
E. Aktan, H. Ahmed, B. Aurand et al., “Parametric study of a high amplitude electromagnetic pulse driven by an intense laser,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 26, Article ID 070701, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Roth, T. E. Cowan, M. H. Key et al., “Fast ignition by intense laser-accelerated proton beams,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 436–439, 2001.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
V. Malka, S. Fritzler, E. Lefebvre et al., “Practicability of protontherapy using compact laser systems,” Medical Physics, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1587–1592, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
U. Masood, M. Bussmann, T. E. Cowan et al., “A compact solution for ion beam therapy with laser accelerated protons,” Applied Physics B, vol. 117, no. 1, pp. 41–52, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
P. Chaudhary, G. Milluzzo, H. Ahmed et al., “Radiobiology experiments with ultra-high dose rate laser-driven protons: methodology and state-of-the-art,” Frontiers in Physics, vol. 9, Article ID 624963, 2021.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. F. Rösch, Z. Szabó, D. Haffa et al., “A feasibility study of zebrafish embryo irradiation with laser-accelerated protons,” The Review of Scientific INSTRUMENTS, vol. 91, Article ID 063303, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Hanton, P. Chaudhary, D. Doria et al., “DNA DSB repair dynamics following irradiation with laser-driven protons at ultra-high dose rates,” Scientific Reports, vol. 9, no. 1, p. 4471, 2019.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Barberio, S. Giusepponi, S. Vallières, M. Scisció, M. Celino, and P. Antici, “Ultra-fast high-precision metallic nanoparticle synthesis using laser-accelerated protons,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, no. 1, p. 9570, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
A. Kleinschmidt, V. Bagnoud, O. Deppert et al., “Intense, directed neutron beams from a laser-driven neutron source at PHELIX,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 25, Article ID 053101, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Borghesi, D. H. Campbell, A. Schiavi et al., “Electric field detection in laser-plasma interaction experiments via the proton imaging technique,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 2214–2220, 2002.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Borghesi, A. J. Mackinnon, D. H. Campbell et al., “Multi-MeV proton source investigations in ultraintense laser-foil interactions,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, Article ID 055003, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
T. E. Cowan, J. Fuchs, H. Ruhl et al., “Ultralow emittance, multi-MeV proton beams from a laser virtual-cathode plasma accelerator,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 92, no. 20, Article ID 204801, 2004.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. Zhu, J. Zhu, X. Li et al., “Status and development of high-power laser facilities at the NLHPLP,” High Power Laser Science and Engineering, vol. 6, p. e55, 2018.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. N. Chen, M. Gauthier, M. Bazalova-Carter et al., “Absolute dosimetric characterization of Gafchromic EBT3 and HDv2 films using commercial flat-bed scanners and evaluation of the scanner response function variability,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 87, Article ID 073301, 2016.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
C. Wang, H. H. An, J. Xiong et al., “A pinhole camera for ultrahigh-intensity laser plasma experiments,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 88, no. 11, Article ID 113501, 2017.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
W. Theobald, C. Sorce, W. R. Donaldson et al., “Inferred UV fluence focal-spot profiles from soft x-ray pinhole-camera measurements on OMEGA,” The Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 91, Article ID 023505, 2020.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
F. Nürnberg, M. Schollmeier, E. Brambrink et al., “Radiochromic film imaging spectroscopy of laser-accelerated proton beams,” The Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 80, Article ID 033301, 2009.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
D. S. Hey, M. H. Key, A. J. Mackinnon et al., “Use of GafChromic film to diagnose laser generated proton beams,” Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 7, Article ID 053501, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
J. F. Ziegler, M. D. Ziegler, and J. P. Biersack, “SRIM-the stopping and range of ions in matter (2010),” Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms, vol. 268, no. 11-12, pp. 1818–1823, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
M. Schollmeier, M. Geissel, A. B. Sefkow, and K. A. Flippo, “Improved spectral data unfolding for radiochromic film imaging spectroscopy of laser-accelerated proton beams,” The Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 85, Article ID 043305, 2014.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
S. Incerti, G. Baldacchino, M. Bernal et al., “The Geant4-DNA project,” International Journal of Modeling, Simulation, and Scientific Computing, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 157–178, 2010.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar
H.-S. Park, B. R. Maddox, E. Giraldez et al., “High-resolution 17–75 keV backlighters for high energy density experiments,” Physics of Plasmas, vol. 15, Article ID 072705, 2008.
View at: Publisher Site | Google Scholar

Copyright

Copyright © 2021 Huiya Liu et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

PDF Download Citation

Download other formats

Order printed copies

Views

665

Downloads

677

Citations