Review Article

An Update Review to Cast Light on the Possible Role of Altered Oropharyngeal Microbiota in Differentiating True Psychosis from Malingered Psychosis in a Forensic Psychiatric Setting

Table 1

Questions outlined by Young and Solomon to evaluate a research article [9].

(1) Is the study question relevant?
(2) Does the study add anything new?
(3) What type of research question is being asked?
(4) Was the study design appropriate for the research question?
(5) Did the study methods address the most important potential sources of bias?
(6) Was the study performed according to the original protocol?
(7) Does the study test a stated hypothesis?
(8) Were the statistical analyses performed correctly?
(9) Do the data justify the conclusions?
(10) Are there any conflicts of interest?