Research Article
Quality of YouTube Videos on Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patient Education
| | Component | Score |
| | Are the aims clear? | 1–5 | | Does it achieve its aims? | 1–5 | | Is it relevant? | 1–5 | | Is it clear what sources were used to compile the publication? | 1–5 | | Is it clear when the information used or reported in the publication was produced? | 1–5 | | Is it balanced and unbiased? | 1–5 | | Does it provide details of additional sources of support and information? | 1–5 | | Does it refer to areas of uncertainty? | 1–5 | | Does it describe how each treatment works? | 1–5 | | Does it describe the benefits of each treatment? | 1–5 | | Does it describe the risks of each treatment? | 1–5 | | Does it describe what would happen if no treatment is used? | 1–5 | | Does it describe how the treatment choices affect the overall quality of life? | 1–5 | | Is it clear there may be more than one possible treatment choices? | 1–5 | | Does it provide support for shared decision making? | 1–5 | | Rate the publication overall | 1–5 | | Average | 1–5 |
|
|
|