Research Article
Analyzing Drivers’ Distractions due to Smartphone Usage: Evidence from AutoLog Dataset
Table 5
Ordinal Logistic Regression Model for the perception about changing the existing interfaces.
| Change the existing interfaces | Coefficient | Standard error | Z-Value | |
| Exp | −18.4540 | 2.501872 | −8.22 | 0.001 | Sex | 140.753 | 17.5606 | 8.42 | 0.001 | Age | −189.627 | 23.15696 | −8.41 | 0.001 | Qualification | 350.8052 | 41.60189 | 8.24 | 0.001 | Driving-mode | 49.33828 | 6.043952 | 8.51 | 0.001 | Traveling mode | 439.1332 | 54.95374 | 8.08 | 0.001 | Purpose of travel | −149.5421 | 18.40198 | −8.45 | 0.001 | Valid license | −529.6207 | 62.55927 | −8.55 | 0.001 | SN1Txt | −29.5140 | 6.452717 | −5.52 | 0.001 | SN2Txt | −59.1540 | 7.291356 | −8.68 | 0.001 | SN3Txt | −321.28643965 | 37.88391 | −8.38 | 0.001 | SN4Txt | 171.4605 | 20.69075 | 8.04 | 0.001 | SN5Txt | −481.4669 | 56.75089 | −8.40 | 0.001 | SN6Txt | 409.5528 | 49.32636 | 8.33 | 0.001 | SN7Txt | 79.18007 | 10.35985 | 7.83 | 0.001 | SN8PCall | −281.5654 | 34.61485 | −7.99 | 0.001 | SN9PCall | 211.8213 | 25.08761 | 8.33 | 0.001 | SN10PCall | 274.8012 | 33.12115 | 8.30 | 0.001 | SN11PCall | −295.5953 | 35.57816 | −8.31 | 0.001 | SN1Mail | −802.6423 | 96.33161 | −8.33 | 0.001 | SN2Mail | −72.61328 | 8.316154 | −8.73 | 0.001 | SN3Mail | 761.8761 | 90.95409 | 8.38 | 0.001 | SN4Mail | −64.51524 | 12.22568 | −5.28 | 0.001 | SN5Mail | 222.3784 | 26.50356 | 8.39 | 0.001 | SN6Mail | 173.682 | 21.2409 | 8.18 | 0.001 | Visual interface-1 | −620.495 | 74.42446 | −8.34 | 0.001 | Visual interface-2 | 607.7279 | 71.93654 | 8.45 | 0.001 | Visual interface-3 | 239.8945 | 29.78239 | 8.05 | 0.001 | Visual interface-4 | −83.16526 | 10.5197 | −7.91 | 0.001 | Visual interface-5 | 248.1227 | 31.36583 | 7.91 | 0.001 | Visual interface-6 | −156.7105 | 19.25008 | −8.14 | 0.001 | Visual interface-7 | 180.2639 | 21.36577 | 8.44 | 0.001 | /cut1 | 1527.27 | 188.7543 | | | /cut2 | 1531.154 | 189.2725 | | | /cut3 | 2242.325 | 274.1231 | | | No of observations = 59 | Wald chi2(32) = 235.44 | | Pseudo R2 = 0.9149 | Log pseudolikelihood = -4.8564726 |
|
|