Research Article
IoT-Enabled Intelligent System for the Radiation Monitoring and Warning Approach
Table 4
Comparison of existing approaches.
| Reference | Dataset used | Problem identified | Methodology | Evaluation measure |
| [11] | Real-time data | Radiation detection | Neural networks and field-programmable gate arrays (FPGAs) | 7.31% accuracy improvement | [12] | Data from typical integrated research reactors | Radiation detection | Monitoring units based on air absorption | Not reported | [13] | 12 dosimeter systems | Radiation detection | LiF: Mg, Ti/TLD-100 and LiF: Mg, Cu, P/(MCP-N, RADCARD) | 0.8%–4.5% average angular response | [10] | Real-time data and external data | Radiation detection | Machine learning and radiation detection sensors | Not reported | [37] | Real-time data | Wound detection | Temperature and humidity sensors and decision trees | 94% | [38] | Real-time data | Health monitoring | Sensors, microcontrollers, fuzzy neural networks | 97% | [39] | Real-time data | Fire monitoring and warning systems for smart buildings | Sensors, microcontrollers, fuzzy control algorithms | Not reported | Proposed system | Real-time data | Radiation monitoring and warning approach | Radiation detection sensors, microcontrollers, adaptive boosting classifiers | 81.7% |
|
|